I *very* much like the actor who plays Watson. Much more than Jude Law's portrayal, actually.

Martin Freeman! Who is also dead sexy. For the record.

But, uh, RDJ makes me think Impure Thoughts, so I can't quite make myself compare -- is it Cumberbatch? (Bumbershoot?) -- to RDJ.

I am, apparently, far more likely to think Impure Thoughts about Cumberbatch than RDJ. The lips and the voice sort of do me in.

I am, apparently, far more likely to think Impure Thoughts about Cumberbatch than RDJ. The lips and the voice sort of do me in.

Oh, he does have a killer voice (my favorite, ever? Matt Frewer. oh yeah. Max Headroom) and nice lips. But he has tiny eyes. And, okay, is just not Tony Stark.

My knowledge of asexuals could fit into a thimble. I have heard Marianne Moore described as most likely asexual, but I don't really know her biography.

They're not all that tiny. They are, however, weirdly wide-set as well as deep-set. Also, freakishly pale.

(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)

The juxtaposition of Burrell's post with PMM's post confused me for a moment. But I'm easily (and tiredly) confused.

(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)

Oh my lord. YES!

(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)

Yes, and more in an uncanny way than an attractive way, to me anyway. Watson on the other hand I'd do in a hot minute.

The juxtaposition of Burrell's post with PMM's post confused me for a moment. But I'm easily (and tiredly) confused.

So glad it wasn't just me. My first thought was, "oh, did I imply Marianne Moore was tiny?," followed by, "is she tiny?"

Where I thought, the number of asexuals is tiny? But deep and wide?

I need more sleep.

I am going to tape Clone Wars. Showing him the AT-AT was a mistake.

I was confused too.

Sherlock is just starting here,but I am tired so I am going to watch tomorrow