My knowledge of asexuals could fit into a thimble. I have heard Marianne Moore described as most likely asexual, but I don't really know her biography.
Buffy ,'Lessons'
Natter 67: Overriding Vetoes
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, nail polish, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
They're not all that tiny. They are, however, weirdly wide-set as well as deep-set. Also, freakishly pale.
(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)
The juxtaposition of Burrell's post with PMM's post confused me for a moment. But I'm easily (and tiredly) confused.
(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)
Oh my lord. YES!
(As Sherlock? He totally looks like you turned a Siamese cat human.)
Yes, and more in an uncanny way than an attractive way, to me anyway. Watson on the other hand I'd do in a hot minute.
The juxtaposition of Burrell's post with PMM's post confused me for a moment. But I'm easily (and tiredly) confused.
So glad it wasn't just me. My first thought was, "oh, did I imply Marianne Moore was tiny?," followed by, "is she tiny?"
Where I thought, the number of asexuals is tiny? But deep and wide?
I need more sleep.
I am going to tape Clone Wars. Showing him the AT-AT was a mistake.
I was confused too.
Sherlock is just starting here,but I am tired so I am going to watch tomorrow
Do you guys really think that PBS edited bits of Sherlock?
Why would they? They don't run ads during the show.
Randomly, do any of you use Instagram? I sort of love how easy it is to take photos, apply filters and upload them. Hence the pics [link] I do think it's iphone only which might be limiting.