I thought it was

in this ever-changing world in which we live in

which makes me gnash my teeth. There's a U2 song with the lyric

and the sun in the sky makes a shadow of you and I

and every time I yell, "I don't care if it rhymes! It's WRONG!" but Bono does not listen to me.

Pansexual?

mmmMaybe. Except for the "not liking anything" times.

Unspecifiedsexual?

Oh, I can be very specific.

But that's not what he said--he said they're with men. He didn't say they were women.

Well, he said they were with men, which makes people assume they are straight. So I am assuming he is talking specifically about women, unless I am totally misreading his post.

edit: OK, now I'm going back and looking at Gud's post again, and I don't actually see him saying that people are assuming they're straight, just that they're not bi. So I am fighting a slightly different fight here. Oops! Carry on...

Pansexual?

mmmMaybe. Except for the "not liking anything" times.

Well, I think there are times that most, if not all, people fall under "not liking anything," but I don't think it makes them cease to be straight/bi/gay, unless it becomes a permanent thing.

But I got NO idea of what to even call myself, so don't take my addlepated advice.

he said they were with men, which makes people assume they are straight

No, he said they were with men which makes people assume there's no such thing as bisexual.

My male dataset is one. I think from reading the bits leading up that there was a discussion of the perception that bi means have-experimented-but-am-actually-straight for women, and actually-I'm-gay for men. I'm just saying I can see how that perception can be formed if my dataset is prevalent.

You're right, ita. I was misreading and conflating with another argument that nobody here is actually making. Sorry, Gud!

But I got NO idea of what to even call myself, so don't take my addlepated advice.

Averse to labelling?