After careful study of the pricing scale, noting that "booty" is under "kitty" and that tits don't seem to be covered anywhere else I'm going to guess that "lady lumps" are titties.
Spike's Bitches 45: That sure as hell wasn't in the brochure.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I am with Jessica. I am particularly particular, because I run a couple, ah, thematic sites, and it's really clear when I get fetish submissions.
I know it's weird to have a website dedicated to barefoot guys. I know that. But have you seen foot fetish sites? I so totally don't have one of those.
So, Jess, what would you call those things that sort of, always work, but aren't psychosexual necessities. besides "How funny...Mom thinks I watch Numbers because of a new interest in math," To use a completely generic example...that happened to my friend. Steph J, David Duchovny has a good one. Of course on Californication, I see more of him than his internist.
Not to loop this conversation back into insanity, but I often hear/use the work kink in that context.
what would you call those things that sort of, always work, but aren't psychosexual necessities
That I call a kink, just because I think it's weird for something to sort of, always work. So having a kink for bandaged hands (what? don't look at me like that) is just a strangeness.
Ok, maybe not always-always. But, you know, dependably. Always-always would lead me to being into Wolflowitz and Joel Steinberg. Gross.
That I call a kink, just because I think it's weird for something to sort of, always work. So having a kink for bandaged hands (what? don't look at me like that) is just a strangeness.
Yup. "Kink" works fine in this context - no need to water down "fetish."
Okay, then I would say I have a fair number of kinks, but not so many fetishes. Not sure if I'm kinky...it's too hard to find people to do *ordinary* stuff with around here.
Scrappy just posted, quite elegantly and clearly, what I've been trying to write and clarify enough to post, so thank you dear, for that.
I am amazed, looking back, at what embarrassed me, what gave me a little thrill of horror, and what titillated me, and what scared the piss out of me, and how those boundaries got expanded.
I tend to think of kink as anything that turns one on, short of permanent change to the body. Ink and piercings can be kink, but mods beyond those...I understand how some people incorporate those into their definition of kink, or even into body image of how-what they see themsevles. For them, permanent change isn't a boundary, but for me, it isn't one I've been willing to cross, and may never be.
Oops. Had a minor emergency and left the computer with this up in the posting box. No doubt things have moved on. Ah well, my two cents, at any road.
I don't have any fetishes but I'm very malleable when it comes to kinks. I never really thought about barefoot guys until ita mentioned them but now I want to look for pictures.