Wasn't Bryce supposed to be very attractive, though? In the all-that-Chuck-couldn't-be way? Did they just style him wrong, or did Matthew get prettier in his old age?
Giles ,'Lies My Parents Told Me'
Natter 64: Yes, we still need you
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Wasn't Bryce supposed to be very attractive, though? In the all-that-Chuck-couldn't-be way?
Yeah, I think so.
Did they just style him wrong, or did Matthew get prettier in his old age?
For me, it's at least mostly because the guy was good-looking, but the character wasn't attractive.
It looks like I'll be seeing both Avatar and Sherlock Holmes on Christmas. I should probably decide on the order and buy tickets. Last time I did a double feature it was the third Bourne followed by Ratatouille.
yeah, Bryce was supposed to be attractive, but thr character was such an ass that it diminished his hotness
I liked Bryce Larkin - I wish that they'd give Neal more stunts to do. That's the Larkin I liked. I liked Bomer in Traveller and barely remember him in Tru Calling
ita, do you have that picture of Jensen - the green one? I think you know the one I mean. . . of course, it could actually be a picture of Dean.
I didn't watch much Chuck, nor invest any in it, so I didn't take Bryce's character particularly seriously. But I did think that Bomer was impossibly pretty at that juncture.
I do not have a picture of Jensen I would qualify as green, sumi--do tell.
I am obsessed with Chuck! And it's coming back soon!
I liked the plot turn at the end of last season, but I really really REALLY can't stand Sarah as an action heroine, and I hate the will-they-won't-they ping pong so it's only ever going to be something I watch when I'm quite bored.
Which places it above Bones, with Baldwin's character as my Hodgins-equivalent.
I am obsessed with Chuck! And it's coming back soon!
WHEEEEE
I'll see if I can find it online.