no, FOX stateside is 24. AI is tuesdays and wednesdays.
Wesley: All right. I'm going to let you all in on something you may have trouble comprehending. I assure you however-- Gunn: Vampires are real. Wesley: I was telling!
'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
Jossverse 1: Emotional Resonance & Rocket Launchers
TV, movies, web media--this thread is the home for any Joss projects that don't already have their own threads, such as Dr. Horrible.
tiggy - Mar 02, 2009 3:36:51 pm PST #345 of 5827
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore
Burrell - Mar 02, 2009 5:22:52 pm PST #346 of 5827
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!
Yes, but I thought it aimed for the Onion and hit "My issues, let me show you them."
I am with erika here. I'm sure he was just being "sarcastic" and I'm sure I'm just being a "humorless bitch" but I still found he pushed my buttons in a decidedly wrong way. I found his spoof more offensive than the show.
erikaj - Mar 02, 2009 7:22:05 pm PST #347 of 5827
Always Anti-fascist!
I feel like he enjoyed depicting those things a bit too much.
Liese S. - Mar 02, 2009 7:24:59 pm PST #348 of 5827
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Yeah. Found the thing offensive.
Find the show offensive, too, y'know.
Allyson - Mar 02, 2009 7:52:57 pm PST #349 of 5827
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
wrong thread
brenda m - Mar 02, 2009 7:53:33 pm PST #350 of 5827
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Question: I'm freakin' 35. Do I still need to put my education at the top of the resume?
No.
Also, I have 2 and a half pages. What are the rules there? I have my last three jobs (dating back to 1998 to show 10+ years experience), my event planning business with budgets/charity receipts, and my writing experience.
I wouldn't go over two, if you can manage it.
Do I put that my book was featured in Entertainment Weekly?
Yeah, definitely.
§ ita § - Mar 03, 2009 3:33:50 pm PST #351 of 5827
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
My sister's just started watching Dollhouse with episode 2. She's asked a question I sure hope we get an answer to soon: Why is Langton even doing this? He's been the closest I've seen to my viewpoint character, but why he even got involved is a very good question, and right now I'm more interested in that than in Paul's quest, for instance.
Nora Deirdre - Mar 03, 2009 3:36:01 pm PST #352 of 5827
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
She's asked a question I sure hope we get an answer to soon: Why is Langton even doing this? He's been the closest I've seen to my viewpoint character, but why he even got involved is a very good question
Totally. It's the most interesting thing going on, IMHO.
Juliebird - Mar 03, 2009 3:44:21 pm PST #353 of 5827
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
thinking about the linked blog that said that the second Echo breaks out of her bondage, there is no more show (I disagree, I think it can still be called "Dollhouse" with Echo/Caroline on the outside trying to bring it down, or even on the inside, completely aware, trying to bring it down), I realized that Ballard's character is also similarly stuck, which got my brain waddling in weird (fanfic-y)directions: I'd rather not see Paul muddling on as a lone Mulder, but maybe the Dollhouse captures him, wipes his sure knowledge of the Dollhouse, sets him back on the street as a changed man, and his memories are stored in the databanks of personalities and Echo gets them . . . phooey, doesn't solve the Ballard issue . . .
§ ita § - Mar 03, 2009 3:50:15 pm PST #354 of 5827
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think that Echo can break out without violating the premise of the show--it just means that one had stated the premise wrong. The premise of Alias might have been that a woman had a second life working as an agent for what she thought was the CIA, and then her realizing it wasn't true violates that premise--or maybe that wasn't precisely the premise after all.