Mal: I call you back? Wash: No, Mal. You didn't. Zoe: I take full responsibility, cap.

'Out Of Gas'


Jossverse 1: Emotional Resonance & Rocket Launchers  

TV, movies, web media--this thread is the home for any Joss projects that don't already have their own threads, such as Dr. Horrible.


Liese S. - Apr 29, 2009 11:53:40 am PDT #1450 of 5827
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

Make no mistake, I think the Dollhouse is evil, and that most of our protaganists here are villains. But I appreciate that it takes a toll on them.

Yeah, this. I have no thoughts on the recent ep as I'm on the road, but overall, definitely this.


Kevin - Apr 29, 2009 1:57:20 pm PDT #1451 of 5827
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

The original pitch was the Dollhouse was good from Joss, but FOX wanted it to be evilish, so it changed as they went along. It's covered in that interview I linked a few pages ago.

I think we all use each other in life. The Sierra/Topher thing made me cry for this reason: I just spent the weekend messing around (erm, not that kind of messing around) with the actress, Dichen Lachman, in the UK. 'cos I paid for the experience at a convention. And then she went away. And I sit here, in my flat, alone. It was a curious feeling.


Kristen - Apr 29, 2009 2:12:54 pm PDT #1452 of 5827

The original pitch was the Dollhouse was good from Joss, but FOX wanted it to be evilish, so it changed as they went along.

So was there no sex with dolls in the original plan?


Kevin - Apr 29, 2009 2:31:53 pm PDT #1453 of 5827
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

There was sex.


§ ita § - Apr 29, 2009 2:33:22 pm PDT #1454 of 5827
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'd like to see how that would be handled with having the Dollhouse still being good. Isn't the sex part where most people think is the Dollhouse at its worst?


Kevin - Apr 29, 2009 2:45:20 pm PDT #1455 of 5827
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

Given the amount of men who use brothels throughout history and buy Maxim, no?

I don't think the good or bad thing comes out of sex per say, I think it's about the Dollhouse's intentions. What is the goal of the Dollhouse as a worldwide organisation? Is it really 'just' fantasy?

I do think Dollhouse has clearly had the angles that as a society and personally we use each other - Paul and Mellie in the last episode being a classic example - and that 'perversion' is often best shared. With layers of self justification thrown on top. I don't think there's anything wrong with Topher hiring Sierra to hang around with. I mean, it's sad, but it's better than being lonely.


§ ita § - Apr 29, 2009 2:49:24 pm PDT #1456 of 5827
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Given the amount of men who use brothels throughout history and buy Maxim, no?

You equate sex with a Doll with buying Maxim? Really?

it's sad, but it's better than being lonely.

How do you define "better"? As healthier? Because establishing consensual peer relationships strikes me as "better".


Kevin - Apr 29, 2009 2:54:57 pm PDT #1457 of 5827
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

I'm thinking a Maxim reader might not be as offended by the notion of paying for sex than, well, this forum. Better can be a short term thing.


Nora Deirdre - Apr 29, 2009 3:04:41 pm PDT #1458 of 5827
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I don't think there's anything wrong with Topher hiring Sierra to hang around with.

He didn't *hire* her, he imprinted a personality on her with the consent of Boyd, not Sierra.

Given the amount of men who use brothels throughout history and buy Maxim, no?

Brothels also prey on women who have few choices, but at least they have more choice on a client by client basis than the Dolls. (sometimes not a *lot* of choice, but...) Every time a Doll has a sexual assignment, that Doll is raped.

Prostitutes get raped too sometimes- it's really not as benign a situation for the women that you are painting.


§ ita § - Apr 29, 2009 3:05:17 pm PDT #1459 of 5827
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm thinking a Maxim reader might not be as offended by the notion of paying for sex

So you're in the camp of paying for sex with an Active is equivalent to hiring a hooker?

I'm not a Maxim buyer, but it is a magazine I pick up at the newstands to read through, and I see a difference.