I thought the movie could have actually been better. I disliked the book and found it repetitive and it was a mystery why the assistant was staying at the job. I found that the movie didn't enlighten me further regarding this issue and with a bit more character work I think they could have explained this.
I also think they made Streep's character a bit too sympathetic, but I understand that was Streep's recommendation.
In the TV series land, both "Gossip Girl" and "True Blood" are better than their books.
I love True Blood but I think the books are better than the series. Sookie is much smarter and less annoying in the books.
I love True Blood but I think the books are better than the series. Sookie is much smarter and less annoying in the books.
I've taken Charlaine Harris' advice and experience the books vs. movies as completely separate entities. I like the detail and supporting characters of the books. I like the sizzle and visuals of the show.
ETA: Twilight improved on the book, in my opinion. Not that that was that hard.
Seriously, with Ed Wood long dead who could have made a movie adaptation worse than the book? Uwe Boll?
Jaws was a better movie. Benchley was a hack, IMO--the book sucked. Hooper had an affair with Brody's wife and died at the end. Feh.
Oh man. I forgot that I even read that book. It did, indeed, suck. Yeah. Jaws definitely proves this rule.
Let us all pause to recall and savor the awesomeness of Lena Olin.
Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin are co-hosting the Oscars. [link]
Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin are co-hosting the Oscars. [link]
That could potentially be awesome.