I'm wondering what are practical solutions. It's pretty clear PJ is endemically unable to not put
all
the Tolkien in, so it would take more movies to accomplish the same OCD nerdery with shorter run times, and people are already pissed enough.
It would seem possible to be less scary more easily than shorter, but the risk of not having a visceral effect on the adults is probably not going to be broached. I don't have any young associations with the book, so I'm surprised when I hear four year old fans of it--I read it at age 11 or so, so the movie would probably be perfectly designed to freaky my shit in a way I enjoy.
It's impossible for me to put aside childless bias, but I think PG-13 is more appropriate for the world and threats I remember than PG, especially with him returning to a universe that had been constructed for an adult movie in the first place.
I can't really see him doing much other than PG-13, basically. I don't know enough about movie demographics to say if charged up adults represent a bigger potential pot than going PG and lightening the scare factor.
From a Hollywood perspective, and having already done very successful adult movies, the choices make sense. But The Hobbit as a book is pitched really young in tone - I'd say it's pitched at about 8 years old. It's funny to read, as an adult, because the plot is pretty objectively scary, but because of the brevity and the voice of the book, it doesn't scare children. It comes off as more gee-whiz adventure.
Tolkien was a chatty guy. He must have written down the age he was aiming at when he wrote it, no? Being appropriate for and pitched at don't have to have the same answer.
The Tolkien Professor (a former colleague), who did a whole podcast lecture series on The Hobbit a few years ago said he was specifically disappointed that they were doing The Hobbit after LotR because they were so different in tone and they would have to darken and change what is so clearly a children's story to make it fit into the LotR framework.
I do not remember how many times I had to sit through the LotR trilogy during Lilly's grade 1 obsession with it.
If she ever finishes The Hobbit (she refuses, because Smaug is her boo), I'm going to have to watch all those over and over again with a small child. I have no parental objections, as my small child found the live-action human violence less terrifying than she finds cartoon violence.
(Up made her run from the theatre in terror. The Winnie the Pooh movie that came out at some point recently, same thing. Helm's Deep? Walk in the park.)
Interesting, Tom. What I found said he didn't consider it a children's book (from Wikipedia too), so there might not be agreement.
as my small child found the live-action human violence less terrifying than she finds cartoon violence.
This is why she won't watch Nightmare Before Christmas with me, isn't it? Hmmm, maybe she'll be okay with Beetlejuice.
Hmmm, maybe she'll be okay with Beetlejuice.
Both of my kids were able to watch Beetlejuice very early, and were only somewhat frightened by the hellish wedding scene at the end.