Might need casket group-rates. Yowza.
Joyce ,'Never Leave Me'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
ARMS. Such arms. Guh. (And I don't guh lightly.)
I'm going to have to watch The Hurt Locker, aren't I? And The Unusuals, also (which has the added draw of Amber Tamblyn).
The Hurt Locker bored me. however, The Unusuals is amazing! i was so sad when it was cancelled.
Can someone take a look and see if I'm missing something here? I read this article about Brave and thought, Huh, that's kind of interesting and I hadn't really thought about it that way, but I'm glad I read this. And then I went down to the comments (it's The Atlantic, so the comments are usually at least marginally above average) and I can't tell whether I spectacularly misread the amount of fail in the article, or whether the comment thread is itself the world's biggest stew of whiny fail in the history of ever. It's definitely a giant mess of Moff's Law. I just... the response is so overwhelmingly, ragingly negative that I'm starting to think I must have totally misread the entire article.
No, it's the comments.
Yeah...people are craxy.
I think the article is poorly written and leaves itself wide open to exactly this kind of criticism, but it's head and shoulders above the HOW DARE YOU IMPLY I MIGHT BE GAY?!?!?!! homophobia going on in the comments. So...both?
What Jessica said. The comments are awful, but the article wasn't awesome.
I WEAR PANTS ON OCCASION AND I TOTALLY LIKE THE PEEN! HOW CAN YOU SUGGEST SUCH A THING! ALSO, I DON'T EVER MAKE ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT ANYONE'S SEXUALITY!
My interpretation of the fail in the article would be that they draw a lightly shaded line between "likes boys things" and "is attracted to girls". My interpretation of what he described is "we don't know". I'm not sure why he doesn't allow for simply "undefined" and goes instead to "pointedly ambiguous".
I don't think his "five ways" of looking at it are the most important five, or the most plausible five. Or the most interesting five.
Sometimes the answer is "we haven't been told."
Are these questions being raised about Snow White? Would they apply?