I didn't really see where Loki had his voice stifled.
It's literalized at the end with him wearing the gag.
Drusilla ,'Conversations with Dead People'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I didn't really see where Loki had his voice stifled.
It's literalized at the end with him wearing the gag.
Why did they gag Loki anyway? Could he otherwise cast spells? Or was everyone just sick of his yapping?
It's literalized at the end with him wearing the gag.
That doesn't retroactively put it in the plot, though.
If that was a thrust of his issue, I found it weak. I don't think it's an empathetic reason to go off the deep end (not that villains have to be empathetic--just understandable is fine, and I thought he was that in Thor but not Avengers), and I don't think as shown it was extreme enough anyway.
Why did they gag Loki anyway?
Because he has a dangerous mouth. He's the Iago of the Gods, always spreading dissension.
I am FINALLY seeing Avengers! All it took was flying to Chicago for the weekend and leaving the kids at home with my parents.
Because the point at which you take resentment at being shut up and make it into a problem that kills other people, you've lost my empathy.
Well, I have to admit, it never made me want to kill.
I'm curious, though. How many people here were fans of Spike? Especially in season 2? That liked "evil" Spike best and bemoaned the chip and the soul. Overlook the way some writers were sympathetic to him and some disliked him. Just the fact he was evil and a killer, but you still liked him. Why did you like him? He was conniving, a liar, a killer, ruthless, and also completely incompetent in pulling off his overcomplicated schemes.
Eh, I'm not going to change any minds. I don't want to. I was just trying to give some insight from another point of view. More from Loki's point of view than from Thor's, Odin's or Frigga's. I'm sure if you had asked either of my brothers if they did that to me, they would tell you it never happened. Thor is the hero of the story and we're seeing the movie from his point of view.
It's literalized at the end with him wearing the gag.
That doesn't retroactively put it in the plot, though.
This. I truly don't see where in Thor or Avengers (until the literal gag) Loki was stifled. Using those 2 movies as the text (i.e., not comics, not Norse mythology [Tim REALLY wants a movie with woman!Loki...no surprise there]), I don't see Loki being stifled, oppressed, cast aside, etc.
How many people here were fans of Spike?
I don't need any inherent correlation between "fans of" and "empathise with", though.
I didn't think Spike was a misunderstood woobie. Hot and evil, but no woobie.
Hot and evil, but no woobie.
Not is season 2, for sure. But he did get plenty woobified later. And I think that's where a lot of folks here lost interest in him. Like Buffy, you like your villains death-ray-destroy-Metropolis evil, without any hint of sentimentality.
I don't need any inherent correlation between "fans of" and "empathise with", though.
I don't think there has to be, but I think there often is for many fans. Which is why your dash is so covered in Loki. We're all very sentimental.