JZ, I'd bet that what that poster really means is that characters are White until proven otherwise.
ita !, that post is made of win.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
JZ, I'd bet that what that poster really means is that characters are White until proven otherwise.
ita !, that post is made of win.
Jessica (sorry, Jess and Jesse!) and Debet, seriously. This:
everyone is a race neutral character in my head
Yeah, I'm gonna make three guesses as to what "race neutral" looks like, and the first two don't count.
Unless this person actually imagines everyone as talky meat, literal throbbing masses of raw veiny muscle tissue that express dialogue by pushing air through their meat. Because that would be kind of awesome.
(It was Jessica above)
BUT I am not that visual in my head, so don't necessarily picture characters at all, unless what they look like is explicitly described. So obviously Cho Chang is Asian, but I wouldn't (if I had read those books) have an actual picture in my head.
Except in the Hunger Games, because I dated two guys who look exactly like Peeta and Gale. The real ones, not the movie ones.
The Talky Meat Games. Just like The Hunger Games, except they remove your skin first.
Also, eww.
Jezebel has unredacted the names of the tweeters. I'm maliciously happy, and I stopped by a couple of the twitter accounts. One's deleted entirely, and one seems to be not only missing the racist Hunger Games post, but there's a re-tweet of a Trayvon Martin sympathy tweet. So sensitive, some people. So empathetic.
To counteract all the shitty Twitters, please go read the description for Dayo Okeniyi's Twitter.
I generally miss nuances of character description, unless it's a big deal, like someone gets rhapsodic over the color of someone's hair etc. The people in my head appear more as the shapes of their names rather than pictures of faces, ie, the shape of the word Katniss rather than a person.
This.
BUT I am not that visual in my head, so don't necessarily picture characters at all, unless what they look like is explicitly described. So obviously Cho Chang is Asian, but I wouldn't (if I had read those books) have an actual picture in my head.
And this.
Which is why I don't have huge problems with casting choices in general.
But if you say a coat is red, it's red.
Which is why I felt that either Schindler's Ark or Michener's Poland must have ripped off the other even though I read them years apart. Same damn girl with the red coat.
And when my husband came home and questioned why our blonde little boy's bottom was wrapped in one of his t-shirts and I explained the situation to him, I could tell when he hid his face in his hands how upset he was about the whole situation as well. And then he put his hands on my shoulders and shook his head before looking into my eyes and said, 'Just promise me you'll never watch The Crying Game.'
I want to believe this means that the husband has a clue while the poster does not. (Assuming the poster is serious, which I suspect not.)
I somehow missed any descriptors about Ged's coloring the first time I read A Wizard of Earthsea. (In my defense I was like eleven at the time, so I wasn't too concerned about what anyone looked like except the dragons.)
I want to believe this means that the husband has a clue while the poster does not
I think it's a pretty safe assumption that the poster is creating a character to mock here, with a husband who gets it.