But it was more positive than negative, and I'm just sticking by my point that most of the reviews so far have been that.
'Objects In Space'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I am not arguing against your point.
Yes you are.
This conversation is about to become a Monty Python sketch, isn't it?
I think we're past that point by now.
And, Hayden, IO9 didn't gush or hate on Source Code, Limitless, or Paul, from a cursory glance. Although I think they were positive about all of them.
EW thought Thor was kind of funny and kind of pretty. Or something. Metacritic has a 58 (I still prefer that over rottentomatoes, since it lets medium-positive reviews only be medium-positive) which is worse than Fast Five (67)and almost exactly the same as Iron Man II (57).
I will see both Fast Five and Thor.
Metacritic and EW did convince me not to see Something Borrowed (35, D+), though.
Metacritic and EW did convince me not to see Something Borrowed (35, D+), though.
You needed help?
I enjoyed the book well enough, and like romantic comedies when they're actually good. This one could have been good. It apparently isn't.
Metacritic and EW did convince me not to see Something Borrowed (35, D+), though.The trailers seemed predictable enough that I feel little need to actually watch the rest of the movie.
I enjoyed the book well enough, and like romantic comedies when they're actually good. This one could have been good. It apparently isn't.
Skimming the thread leads me to believe this refers to Thor. I hope to god it doesn't.