Spike's Bitches 44: It's about the rules having changed.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I thought a lot of the raw food movement was discredited, what with so many plants having natural defenses against being eaten which are only broken down by being cooked.
The only way the human body has of breaking down cellulose is our teeth, and they're not very efficient. Heat breaks down cell walls very efficiently, making nutrients from plants available to your body in vastly larger quantities (some are also destroyed in the process, but it's a net gain).
(I also really wish I hadn't read the comments on the vegan breakfast entry, because now I know she's an anti-vaxxer. Ick.)
(I also really wish I hadn't read the comments on the vegan breakfast entry, because now I know she's an anti-vaxxer. Ick.)
Ugh. I knew from a post a few years ago that they tried to expose their kids to chicken pox so that they wouldn't need to get the vaccine, but the phrasing on that one seemed more like, "We'll try this first, and if it doesn't work, we'll get the vaccine."
Raw food recipes can be fun to play around with, especially in the summer when there's lots of good fresh produce and it's too hot to cook.
I didn't see the raw food diet as being "discredited," only the claim that it was a more natural, and by definition more healthy, diet. It seems to have some benefits, such as weight loss, and for some with allergies I think it can be beneficial.
Their mother puts a ton of thought and planning into their food, though.
That's why it's working. Like that mom is making sure the kids, esp the young ones, have enough fat in their diet. And nuts.
Had some friends that were raw foodist. Due to a long story ( vengeful friends, social services)they had to speak to a nutritionist . Only change to the diet -- maybe add some cooked beans occasionally. Once again , maybe an odd idea- but well thought out by mom and dad.
I think that a raw diet can be good or bad, depending on how you deal with it. If you think it out and pay attention to the nutritional aspects, it can be fine. but, if you think a raw diet is just eating salad all of the time, it's a problem.
I've heard a few recommendations for this page for info on weight gain in kids: [link] It's got yet another version of the avocado pudding at the bottom -- this one with added fruit and nut butter.
He's generally okay, I just know that they're always on the lookout for ways to sneak extra fat into his diet when needed.
In the complete opposite of raw food, Trader Joe's has a frozen concoction of scallops, peas, and mushrooms in a sauce that's mostly crème frâiche and Emmental cheese. We just had it over pasta, and it is REALLY good. (I would have preferred more peas, but if that's my biggest complaint, I'm taking the win.)
I wonder what raw foodists with a family history of food allergies feed their kids. My neighbors' kids can't have nuts or tropical fruits (including avocado and banana), so dairy is pretty much a must for keeping their calorie intake up.
I didn't see the raw food diet as being "discredited," only the claim that it was a more natural, and by definition more healthy, diet.
The claim that raw foods are healthier because heat destroys nutrients has been pretty thoroughly proven false.
We have a raw food "cook book" which actually requires some low heat or dehydration for some recipes.
So in addition to the horribly muscle aches today, I've started getting cold sweats. I'm really over this virus.