I think Tilda Swinton is unnaturally beautiful, but not very attractive. In fact, more offputting.
And I still think last night's dress was appalling.
Sean Bean and Daniel Craig are rugged verging on the joli laid. Manly and rrowr.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I think Tilda Swinton is unnaturally beautiful, but not very attractive. In fact, more offputting.
And I still think last night's dress was appalling.
Sean Bean and Daniel Craig are rugged verging on the joli laid. Manly and rrowr.
I'm curious -- what is it that you find attractive about her?
It's weird - she's kind of manly-looking, right? I tend to find androgynous women rather attractive. Or maybe it's the big ears and buggy-eyes....
I'm curious -- what is it that you find attractive about her?
I think she's attractive, particularly her bone structure. But maybe striking is a better word.
And I think she looked fabulous last night, despite her god-awful dress. But she often has hideous clothes.
Furthermore, to me, she's not one of those people trying to be a "star", so I give her more of a pass on wardrobe. But the people trying? Who have all the resources in the world to look great? I don't get why they make the choices they do.
I think it was here that I once commented about Swinton being beautiful without actually being pretty. There's just something compelling about her—I'm pretty sure it's a combo of movement and expression rather than anything concrete about her features.
I think Tilda Swinton is unnaturally beautiful, but not very attractive.
Hm. Again, I'm curious, but just about the semantics: how can someone be beautiful but not attractive (or even "not very" attractive)? I would have thought it would be the other way around. Like, one can be attractive but not beautiful, but not vice versa.
Sean Bean and Daniel Craig are rugged verging on the joli laid. Manly and rrowr.
I see the rugged, but it doesn't come off as attractive to me.
There's aomething about Swinton that just doesn't click with me, either. I see how she is strikingly ... something. But I can't call it beautiful. Then again, I can't just dimiss her, either. She's got this presence that kind of haunts you.
t /Aimee on Tilda
I googled Swinton images - for me, anyway, the less feminine she appears, the more attractive. So I'm guessing it's the androgynity that does it for me.
how can someone be beautiful but not attractive (or even "not very" attractive
She doesn't look human enough for me to find her attractive. She inhabits the uncanny valley, for me. But I can't take my eyes off her--bone structure as other people have cited is a biggie, and something about her eyes.
Salma Hayek is attractive. She looks touchable. Hella attractive. And beautiful.
I think she looked dreadful last night. But I totally agree with the Fug Girls that she is crazy awesome, in her own way, and should totally go by "Swinton!".
I also agree that the less feminine she appears the more attractive. (Except in that Narnia dress, where she is GORGEOUS).
I think what's kind of awesome about her is how changeable she is. She is striking, but also at the same time can look SO DIFFERENT...not a blank slate, exactly, because she IS striking, but add a bit of this and a wardrobe and make up and hair and WHOAH, does she look completely and totally different than she did in a previous role/movie.
Some men and women look beautiful to me, as in they are lovely things to look at, but they don't arouse one iota of lust (young Cary Grant). Some are beautiful AND lustworthy (Ewan Macgregor), and some just lustworthy (Daniel Craig). YLustMV