Well, looks like schools DON'T have the right to strip-search children suspected of harboring NSAIDs. [link]
'Lessons'
Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
You don't say.
What the shit, I just read the story. What the shit?
I thought Keith's reading was pretty funny, but y'all know that as Olbermann goes, so goes my nation. I found the letters surprisingly heart-felt yet shockingly misspelled. Also, not sure what he was thinking, but I felt that over the stim as well. so.
Only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the part of the ruling that Redding's privacy rights had been violated.
What a douchenozzle.
Well, looks like schools DON'T have the right to strip-search children suspected of harboring NSAIDs.
I had to read the article to see who was the one vote that thought it was ok. Clarence Thomas. Anyone surprised?
xposty with Frank
My take on the Sanford affair is that affairs are an issue of personal ethics, not public ethics. As far as his personal life goes, that's between him and his family. That he'd leave the country without taking steps to make sure someone knew where he was and that someone was in charge? Those are violations of the public trust.
No. Although most legal opinions end when one Justice calls another a douchenozzle, Frank.
I had to read the article to see who was the one vote that thought it was ok. Clarence Thomas. Anyone surprised?
A little. You're saying he voted differently from Scalia?
A little. You're saying he voted differently from Scalia?
That DID surprise me a little. Leave it to Clarence to dissent from Scalia in the asshatty way.