She ain't movin'. Serenity's not movin'.

Kaylee ,'Out Of Gas'


Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Apr 01, 2009 12:05:54 pm PDT #13398 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Over an "amen?" Seriously? Dayum.


Gudanov - Apr 01, 2009 12:06:58 pm PDT #13399 of 30000
Coding and Sleeping

That's going to freak me out for days.

Yeah, that's pretty damn horrible.


Gudanov - Apr 01, 2009 12:12:33 pm PDT #13400 of 30000
Coding and Sleeping

legal experts say her extreme faith doesn't make her criminally insane.

Well I totally agree with that. I don't think religion should be an issue in determining mental competence.


§ ita § - Apr 01, 2009 12:24:07 pm PDT #13401 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If my extreme faith leads to the same results as someone else's insanity with a similar lack of agreement with conventional right and wrong, though?

This Ricola better work. The Chloraseptic I gravitated towards had saccharin. But it looked more convincing.


Gudanov - Apr 01, 2009 12:30:09 pm PDT #13402 of 30000
Coding and Sleeping

If my extreme faith leads to the same results as someone else's insanity with a similar lack of agreement with conventional right and wrong, though?

I think there is a difference between not being able to distinguish between right and wrong and knowing you are doing something wrong according to the law or socially accepted morality, but are justifying it due to religious faith.

If a religious fanatic plants a bomb that kills someone and justifies it with his or her faith would that person be allowed to plead insanity? It shouldn't be any different than murdering a toddler.


Juliebird - Apr 01, 2009 12:35:14 pm PDT #13403 of 30000
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

Found three dead baby bunnies at work today. Looked like they'd been still-born, or birthed and abandoned to the elements (naturally fallen fruit and nuts were scarce last fall, maybe mummie knew that she couldn't take care of them...) As much as we have a rabbit problem at work (along with groundhogs, chipmunks, and the occasional deer), it's still sad to see. Their ears were still slicked back along their heads and their little fur coats still slicked down. Or maybe a hawk got mom, but why birth them out of the warren?

Boss won't give me a budget to spend on nuts and fruit for the critters to distract them from the pansies and violas that I'm planting out.

But, FLOWERS!!!! Okay, okay, the witch hazel and snow drops and helleborus have been blooming for a month now, as well as a crazy viburnum with fragrant pink flowers. And now the early magnolias and irises and chionodoxa are beginning. There's a few spots of southern slopes where the daffodils are braving the weather, and the lungwort and virginia bluebell and blooming in my favorite colour.


§ ita § - Apr 01, 2009 12:36:47 pm PDT #13404 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If a religious fanatic plants a bomb that kills someone and justifies it with his or her faith would that person be allowed to plead insanity.

If they're insane, sure. It just sounded too much like having a religious argument for your actions is incompatible with being bugfuck insane in the eyes of the court. I don't think it should be, and I think it's a really hard line to draw. If aliens told me my child would come back to life I'm crazy, unless it's a space clam, and then I'm just a Scientologist and not crazy at all.


Juliebird - Apr 01, 2009 12:38:29 pm PDT #13405 of 30000
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

If my extreme faith leads to the same results as someone else's insanity with a similar lack of agreement with conventional right and wrong, though?

Craxy is as craxy does?

More seriously, I was brought up to believe that there were the laws of God, and the laws of Man, and God wanted us to also obey the laws of Man. Therefore, using God as an excuse to flout Man's law would be an affront to God. One's religion/faith may vary.


Gudanov - Apr 01, 2009 12:44:33 pm PDT #13406 of 30000
Coding and Sleeping

It just sounded too much like having a religious argument for your actions is incompatible with being bugfuck insane in the eyes of the court.

I don't think they are incompatible, I just think, though it is difficult, that mental competence should be weighed regardless of religion. I'll admit that isn't easy.


Cashmere - Apr 01, 2009 12:52:37 pm PDT #13407 of 30000
Now tagless for your comfort.

I hate to say it but the mental competency of criminal defendants doesn't often make a difference in the court system. They have to be feces-smearing, drooling, raving lunatics (and in that case, if they're docile when medicated they're often shuffled through and imprisoned in regular prisons anyway).

They even have a "guilty but insane" plea that is very effective. The crazy person pleads guilty, goes to prison where they receive next to no mental health care in prison.

I'm not saying let crazy people who commit heinous crimes go free but caging them in regular prisons isn't the answer, either.