Poor Pluto. That's got to be bad for its self-esteem.
'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
egad, tommyrot, that's horrifying.
egad, tommyrot, that's horrifying.
Yeah. I think we talked about this case before, but her plea of "Guilty, unless he rises from the dead" is new.
her plea of "Guilty, unless he rises from the dead" is new.
It's a weird case. If he doesn't come back, she accepts that her actions led to his death and she'll testify against the others. But she's still sure he's coming back. Poor woman.
I missed the earlier talk I guess. Yeeps. That's going to freak me out for days.
Over an "amen?" Seriously? Dayum.
That's going to freak me out for days.
Yeah, that's pretty damn horrible.
legal experts say her extreme faith doesn't make her criminally insane.
Well I totally agree with that. I don't think religion should be an issue in determining mental competence.
If my extreme faith leads to the same results as someone else's insanity with a similar lack of agreement with conventional right and wrong, though?
This Ricola better work. The Chloraseptic I gravitated towards had saccharin. But it looked more convincing.
If my extreme faith leads to the same results as someone else's insanity with a similar lack of agreement with conventional right and wrong, though?
I think there is a difference between not being able to distinguish between right and wrong and knowing you are doing something wrong according to the law or socially accepted morality, but are justifying it due to religious faith.
If a religious fanatic plants a bomb that kills someone and justifies it with his or her faith would that person be allowed to plead insanity? It shouldn't be any different than murdering a toddler.