It looks like that!
It also looks very very pretty.
Simon: I, uh... I never-never shot anyone before. Book: I was there, son. I'm fair sure you haven't shot anyone yet.
'War Stories'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Amy - Apr 13, 2010 12:02:34 pm PDT #7230 of 30002
Because books.
aurelia - Apr 13, 2010 12:05:12 pm PDT #7231 of 30002
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Thanks. I thought the hat & ponytail seemed likely to be crew.
Beverly - Apr 13, 2010 12:10:00 pm PDT #7232 of 30002
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.
But the t-shirt picture. Jesus, the guns are frigging HUGE.
And the *thighs*, such a luscious curve.
Marcia - Apr 13, 2010 12:49:27 pm PDT #7233 of 30002
Kneel before Glod. ~Stephen Colbert
I just want Jared to get back to his S3 bulk. I love him toned and muscled, but it's a little too Schwarzenegger for me.
Cass - Apr 13, 2010 12:59:25 pm PDT #7234 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
Why did I try and google for those pieces of clothing?
I have no idea. I used to image Google, now I just hit provocateuse first. It's easier and there's nice QA.
Morgana - Apr 13, 2010 1:26:11 pm PDT #7235 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber
This is a carryover from last night's fanfic conversation... I was playing with my Delicious tags, and got confused yet again over the "gen" tag. I used to think of gen as the Supernatural equivalent of a G-rated movie -- the guys running around solving a case, maybe some whumpage, some hurt/comfort or some angst, but no sex of any sort. Is this the generally accepted definition? Because despite my aversion to angelic sex, I do have a Sam/Castiel story and its sequel on there (it's really very, very good - the author made me believe it) and I wasn't sure if that qualified to be labelled as gen.
aurelia - Apr 13, 2010 2:07:39 pm PDT #7236 of 30002
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
I thought gen was just not slash, but I only very occasionally read fic.
Amy - Apr 13, 2010 2:09:34 pm PDT #7237 of 30002
Because books.
If the romantic pairing is the point of the story, then it's not gen. If Whoever and Whoever are solving a case and just happen to already be a couple, and the case is the focus, I think it's gen, but I don't know if fandom agrees.
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2010 2:16:00 pm PDT #7238 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The semantics leaves some holes, doesn't it? Slash is either gay or non-canonical gay with sexual content, and het is straight sexual content, and gen is not focussed on sexual content, right?
Most days that's what I believe, with slash being non-canonical gay (so Jack/Ianto isn't slash--but then it's not het, so I don't know how it's filed).
Amy - Apr 13, 2010 2:26:58 pm PDT #7239 of 30002
Because books.
Yeah, I've never been real clear on it. I'm not sure fandom is either, to be honest.
Wait, non-canonical gay. So in your example Jack and Ianto are both gay (or bi) characters but are not paired in the show?
There should be a decongestant that doesn't make me stupid.