Though I have to admit I don't get how pushing Dean to kill Sam or Not!Sam killing Dean fits in with the ultimate plan, since Lucifer wouldn't have had a vessel in the first case and Dean wouldn't have gone to hell in the second (or at least hadn't had a chance to make a deal yet)
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Though I have to admit I don't get how pushing Dean to kill Sam or Not!Sam killing Dean fits in with the ultimate plan
I've been handwaving all that stuff as tests. Like the Croatoan virus was, in the end.
Or just pure torture, if you like screwing with Dean and you're pretty sure he's never going to be able to pull the trigger.
I believe Meg when Meg says to screw the master plan. I think Meg's in it for the pain.
Yeah--she hadn't said that this time when I posted, and I forgot it from the first time. I believe her too.
It, uh. May be one of those exchanges that sticks in my head. Maybe a little bit.
I believe Meg when Meg says to screw the master plan. I think Meg's in it for the pain.
So very much This.
Huh. I'm watching the Fringe special features, and in describing a scene in which Olivia has to stab a bad guy, Kirk Acevedo says, "She has to get all Glenn Close on him."
Now, I have never seen Fatal Attraction, but I still found this reference curious, especially in light of Dean's random reference. Is Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction somehow the embodiment of woman-on-man violence or something?
I think it's an incredibly bad embodiment, since she was the bad guy. We have enough good guy women (ugh, problematic, but you know what I mean) that surely she could have gone all Ripley on his ass or something, you know?
Also...I'm sure Glenn would like to move past that. She doesn't even list it as a favourite role.
I always thought the Glenn Close role in Fatal Attraction was a specific type of "embodiment of woman-on-man violence," since in addition to being slasher-movie levels of violent she was also completely obsessively nuts ("I will not be ignored.") It was a badly written movie in oh so many ways, but that character went crazy because she was a single successful career woman of a certain age who was bold enough to have an affair with a man she wanted even though he was married. He of course stayed with his wife and kid, and she of course got pregnant. And at that point she went totally over the top (those wacky pregnancy hormones I guess) and started stalking and boiling bunnies and such. So her rage and violence were all triggered by insults to the stereotypically feminine parts of her, not by immediate danger or circumstance.
I think it's an incredibly bad embodiment, since she was the bad guy. We have enough good guy women (ugh, problematic, but you know what I mean) that surely she could have gone all Ripley on his ass or something, you know?
And saying Ripley would be better just because it's the character name. Does anyone even remember Glenn Close's character name in Fatal Attraction?