I just want to reiterate that that Mary/Anna fight was COMPLETELY BADASS.
(...And hot?)
It's good to have cargo. Makes us a target for every other scavenger out there, though, but sometimes that's fun too.
Mal ,'Shindig'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Polter-Cow - Feb 05, 2010 7:44:39 am PST #5115 of 30002
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
§ ita § - Feb 05, 2010 7:46:52 am PST #5116 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The angel thing at the end gave me an actual chill.
It was Castiel, okay? Okay?
Amy - Feb 05, 2010 7:48:41 am PST #5117 of 30002
Because books.
GOOD CALL.
§ ita § - Feb 05, 2010 7:54:51 am PST #5118 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I am sad Mom and Dad didn't get to meet Castiel, even if they were going to forget him. He's looking out for their boys as much as he can. Misha's really not getting much to do.
eta: OMG. Trailer for next week. Alky Dean...Sam with bloodface. Man, the first synopsis of this episode I read sounded haha funny.
Lee - Feb 05, 2010 8:04:16 am PST #5119 of 30002
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
I just want to reiterate that that Mary/Anna fight was COMPLETELY BADASS.
Mary with the knife was completely badass and hot.
(ita, please don't tell me if she was doing it wrong)
P.M. Marc - Feb 05, 2010 8:09:36 am PST #5120 of 30002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Mary with the knife was completely badass and hot.
Esp. knowing she's fighting while knocked up.
Which puts this episode at probably late May, early June 1978.
sumi - Feb 05, 2010 9:25:45 am PST #5121 of 30002
Art Crawl!!!
Sneak Peek for next week.
Matt the Bruins fan - Feb 05, 2010 11:29:32 am PST #5122 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I thought Anna did a complete 180° from her former characterization. Previously she'd been the one arguing for the end not justifying the means. While Castiel has a personal stake that's prompted him to rebel, I'd expect her to do so out of a desire to do what's right, and murdering innocent people in the name of expediency shouldn't fit that bill.
Also not thrilled with Michael's revelation that the Winchesters have some extra-special blood that makes them suitable hosts. I much preferred it when it looked like the echoes of Dean & Sam's relationship were what made them the perfect agents to act out his issues with Lucifer.
§ ita § - Feb 05, 2010 11:54:44 am PST #5123 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'd expect her to do so out of a desire to do what's right, and murdering innocent people in the name of expediency shouldn't fit that bill.
I'm actually a fan of sacrificing the few to save the many, so that transition doesn't seem out of place to me.
As for the magical Winchester blood--they're not the only extant brothers with daddy/sibling issues. Why can't any of them be used as vessels instead?
Michael's line about raising Lucifer is kinda hinky. Angels need raising? That's taking the parenting metaphor a bit far.
Anne W. - Feb 05, 2010 12:07:07 pm PST #5124 of 30002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.
Michael's line about raising Lucifer is kinda hinky. Angels need raising? That's taking the parenting metaphor a bit far.
I thought Michael was doing a ham-handed job of pushing the similarities between him and Dean. Whether that ham-handedness was meant to be a character note or just the writers being sloppy, I have no idea.