I think you could save the other one for later, definitely. It'll demand some serious focus.
I love the one you're working on! Samzilla! Heh. Oh, DEAN.
It's simple. I slap 'em around a bit, torture 'em, make their lives hell...Sure, the nice guys'll run away,but every now and then you'll find a prince like Spike who gets off on it.
Buffy ,'Get It Done'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Amy - Jul 12, 2013 5:17:51 pm PDT #28616 of 30002
Because books.
§ ita § - Jul 12, 2013 5:31:14 pm PDT #28617 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't even know if the time Sam starts getting tall even makes sense. But tall at fifteen or sixteen and getting Dean's help works, right?
I also have this conviction that Dean had Jensen's hairstyles, and Sam is stuck on the least "high and tight" haircut Dean ever had--it's hard to draw, though, without doing young Jensen's face really well.
Amy - Jul 12, 2013 5:44:24 pm PDT #28618 of 30002
Because books.
I would think by 16 he'd be at least *as* tall as Dean.
What do you mean by Dean having Jensen's hairstyles, though? Jensen has had pretty long hair on occasion, and I can't imagine Dean with anything but the semi-military thing he has going on now.
§ ita § - Jul 12, 2013 5:48:46 pm PDT #28619 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Did you read the story of how Dean got his knife? If memory serves, that's also how he got his haircut, and maybe some facial bruising in sparring with his father--I have the fanon that he was as pretty as Jensen with the floppy twinky hair that Sam basically kept (but it was never as twinky on him), until there was a come to Jesus (away from the pedos) realisation on John's part that might never have been voiced (but Dean worked out) that put an end to all that.
Amy - Jul 12, 2013 5:52:45 pm PDT #28620 of 30002
Because books.
I did read that story! And I do love it. But I think actual factual canon would be short-haired Dean. At least in my head.
§ ita § - Jul 12, 2013 5:55:40 pm PDT #28621 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I am clearly putting a lot in between Brock and Ridge (seriously??), and neither were as pretty, but I have a vague hooker storyline that depends on it, so I'mma keep it.
Amy - Jul 12, 2013 6:05:21 pm PDT #28622 of 30002
Because books.
Well, that's okay then!
Amy - Jul 12, 2013 6:18:29 pm PDT #28623 of 30002
Because books.
Hey, a Mary and/or Jess nightgown!
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 12, 2013 7:52:54 pm PDT #28624 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Is it flame retardant?
§ ita § - Jul 13, 2013 9:10:34 am PDT #28625 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I just read a D/C underage brothers incest story. Because I wanted to work out what separated it from a Wincest story, and the answer was pretty much nothing. Nothing explained why they were apparently full blood brothers and Castiel was four years younger than Dean. Nothing in their relationship couldn't have been written into a Wincest story. I don't even recall if there were any physical descriptors that would have to have been changed.
So what's the point? Is there a big need for search and replace Destielcest? If Cas is exactly the same as Sam would have been, why can't you just read Wincest?
There was an aunt Rachel, but that doesn't even make huge sense for D/C, so....
I did a quick skim of the writer's other work, and didn't see any Wincest of any age.