Julie, I think she went on an anti-slash tirade at some point. It was before I was paying attention to people in fandom.
Zoe: So you two were kissin'? Book: Well. Isn't that... special?
'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - Oct 04, 2011 11:42:52 am PDT #22071 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
P.M. Marc - Oct 04, 2011 1:09:24 pm PDT #22072 of 30002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
I'm pretty sure you can look her up on Fandom Wank.
Her writing's too soft-edged, and she's a tool, therefore, I won't read her.
§ ita § - Oct 04, 2011 1:13:30 pm PDT #22073 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Yeah, I kind of agree with you about her characterisation, Plei. I haven't read any of her stuff in donkey's years.
I just got partway through a D/C BB story with no Sam. I can't work out why there's no Sam. It doesn't make any sense. The premise is that there is a reality where John never dragged Dean into hunting and the striga happened to him. Cas throws himself back into this reality and ends up his guidance counsellor in high school.
Anne W. - Oct 04, 2011 1:15:19 pm PDT #22074 of 30002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.
Her writing's too soft-edged
Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this?
P.M. Marc - Oct 04, 2011 1:19:57 pm PDT #22075 of 30002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this?
Too... marshmallow-y? Wet? The characters are slightly more idealized than I like to see, fewer shades of grey and fewer rough edges.
Amy - Oct 04, 2011 1:24:23 pm PDT #22076 of 30002
Because books.
Out of curiosity, what do you mean by this?
For me, she's a little Hallmark card, depending on the story. Sometimes I've enjoyed her stuff here and there, but usually it's very idealized, as Plei said.
Anne W. - Oct 04, 2011 1:27:30 pm PDT #22077 of 30002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.
Ahhh... I get it. I also don't see that style fitting all that well with the 'verse, for the most part (although there would obviously be exceptions).
§ ita § - Oct 04, 2011 1:29:19 pm PDT #22078 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
She kinda reminds me of K Hanna Korossy (or whatever her name is). Her characterisation never evolved with the show, even though she was supposed to be setting her stories later and later in canon. They always seemed very S1 innocent. Also, they cuddled a lot.
Juliebird - Oct 04, 2011 4:01:17 pm PDT #22079 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
I'm excited about apokteino's story, but it's a 74,000 wordcount!
obstinatrix still has a bit of a snotty bit on the main post "see masterpost of for unwarnings".
Show! I actually don't want them to head back to the Campbell's compound, mostly because I don't want to be reminded of their having existed (sorry Mary!).
Amy - Oct 05, 2011 6:00:26 am PDT #22080 of 30002
Because books.
In this morning's rerun news, I want Dean to run into Patrick (from the aging episode) and ask him to find out what happened to Castiel (or do a spell or something), and then have angry, grieving, hot, solace sex. Or something like that.