You've got my support. Just think of me as...as your... You know, I'm searching for 'supportive things' and I'm coming up all bras.

Xander ,'Empty Places'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Theresa - May 04, 2009 3:33:18 pm PDT #2067 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"

Oh that is an awesome thought Bev. It would also be a way to show that they lost a brother they never knew they had and even though they naturally won't talk about it, it did have some effect.

Also...

Plei and Perkins are Evil and so is Anne for her alternative version. Jilli is the only one who speaks the truth.

Remember the Friends episode where Joey was reading Little Women and they would put the book in the freezer when it would get to a part that was upsetting him like Beth's death? I wonder if I can just tape the next two weeks and put the tivo in the freezer?


Atropa - May 04, 2009 4:46:04 pm PDT #2068 of 30002
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

For the sake of the narrative, I completely understand why Bobby's death is necessary. I really do. I just don't WANT it to happen.

Also, yes, Perkins is evil like an evil thing.


Consuela - May 04, 2009 5:04:38 pm PDT #2069 of 30002
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

Okay, since I brought up Bobby's death: I see Bobby's death as narratively necessary because at the end of every season the Winchesters have to lose something.

S1: John died (Dean told he might have to kill Sam)

S2: Sam died (Dean made the deal with Lilith)

S3: Dean died (Sam started working with Ruby)

What's left to lose but Bobby? You can't kill either one of the boys again with the same emotional impact. But if Bobby dies, he's not coming back: that might be one of the things Adam's death told us. In the end, it's only going to be Sam and Dean.

Which also plays into the whole coming-of-age theme of the show: they have to learn to stand on their own, do their own work, make their own choices--so long as Bobby's there fixing things for them, they're not full adults under the terms of the narrative.

Additionally, if they're really playing out this addiction storyline for Sam, he's not yet at the point of agreeing that the cost of the addiction is too high compared to what he's getting out of it. In other words, he's not going to agree to go off the stuff, not without going further down, hitting bottom. And he's going to be feeling utterly betrayed by Dean and Bobby.

So one way to have Sam hit bottom is to have him kill someone who matters (i.e., not the nameless possession victim he murdered last week), and as above, it can't be Dean. Who's left but Bobby? It doesn't have to be on purpose, could be kind of accidental, but I think that's what is going to happen.

Anyway. That's my thinking. I don't want to see Bobby die, but more and more I'm not seeing any way out of it.


-t - May 04, 2009 5:31:44 pm PDT #2070 of 30002
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I don't know, just looking at that list, going John dies -> Sam dies -> Dean dies -> Bobby dies seems like stepping down the emotional impact.

Not to say that's not where there going, but it doesn't seem that compelling to me.


Polter-Cow - May 04, 2009 5:38:06 pm PDT #2071 of 30002
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

John dies -> Sam dies -> Dean dies -> Bobby dies

John dies -> Sam dies -> Dean dies -> EVERYONE dies

How's that?


Consuela - May 04, 2009 5:45:25 pm PDT #2072 of 30002
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

seems like stepping down the emotional impact.

True, except my theory involves Sam killing Bobby.


Anne W. - May 04, 2009 5:52:25 pm PDT #2073 of 30002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

True, except my theory involves Sam killing Bobby.

Oh, yes. That would ramp things up considerably.

The only problem I would potentially have with that, from a narrative perspective, is how they would handle any possible redemption for Sam. My fear in that case is that the writers would try to keep Sam redeemable by pulling the "the demon blood made him do it," and that would piss me off in much the same way the "magic is crack" storyline in Buffy Season Six pissed me off.

On edit: Just to clarify, I do like the way they're handling the addiction angle in the show--so far. It's been earned rather than appearing out of left field. I just don't want to see it wind up being used as an excuse to wipe Sam's slate clean.


Amy - May 04, 2009 5:59:47 pm PDT #2074 of 30002
Because books.

My fear in that case is that the writers would try to keep Sam redeemable by pulling the "the demon blood made him do it," and that would piss me off in much the same way the "magic is crack" storyline in Buffy Season Six pissed me off.

Yes, THIS.

I can see Sam being responsible in some way, though. Not getting there in time to save him because he's off being dark!Sam, or whatever.

Either way, one or both of the boys has to be able to feel guilty about it to make it resonate.


Marcia - May 04, 2009 6:35:45 pm PDT #2075 of 30002
Kneel before Glod. ~Stephen Colbert

My working denial theory: Harper's Island is canceled. Bobby lives. Dean kills Ruby. Season 5 rift commences.


Morgana - May 04, 2009 7:03:26 pm PDT #2076 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

I AM A DELICATE FLOWER. I CAN ONLY TAKE SO MUCH PAIN.

Or something.

::clutches boys to chest::

Amy, somehow I doubt that your clutching intentions are completely for the benefit of the *boys.*