I'd also allow that he was *having sex* with Jess when the show started, even though we don't see it onscreen.
That's one spunky little girl you've raised. I'm gonna eat her.
The Mayor ,'End of Days'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Amy - Feb 15, 2011 11:05:51 am PST #17910 of 30002
Because books.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2011 11:07:12 am PST #17911 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
How many have there been? Madison and the doctor in the siren ep. Does Ruby count, what with being a demon and all?
Sorry. She said kissed. So she was counting Madison and Sarah, not Cara or Ruby.
eta: and therefore Jess definitely counts.
Amy - Feb 15, 2011 11:08:49 am PST #17912 of 30002
Because books.
He kisses Cara and Ruby! I think. But it's definitely fair to assume, anyway.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2011 11:10:15 am PST #17913 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Let me go back for the quote:
There were only two women that I can recall with whom Sam shared spit and/or semen
She's making a point that he's shy about sex. So eliminating Ruby from that would be really obscuring the argument.
Amy - Feb 15, 2011 11:24:22 am PST #17914 of 30002
Because books.
Well, she's still wrong, because he kisses Sarah and that girl Laurie from Hookman, iirc.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say she's being Wrong on the Internet. Hmph.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2011 11:26:09 am PST #17915 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Someone mentioned Cara. I have now mentioned Ruby and Laurie. Last time I corrected her she told me my correction was irrelevant. I expect something similar this time too.
sumi - Feb 15, 2011 11:40:47 am PST #17916 of 30002
Art Crawl!!!
Boy. You don't agree with her - the facts are irrelevant to her case.
Nice.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2011 11:58:14 am PST #17917 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
One of the reasons I like IO9 so much is that they seamlessly integrate corrections (at least on the show recaps I pay attention to). The recappers really pay attention to the community, and explain themselves without sounding defensive.
Also, they're more au fait with fandom than their audience is, primarily. Which is kinda weird. Some of the posters found supernatural fandom secrets and were all "ick! weecest!" God, I don't like it, but does it have to be a production every time you unearth a reference?
Amy - Feb 15, 2011 1:26:12 pm PST #17918 of 30002
Because books.
The io9 recapper is on the ball, plus she clearly loves the show, which makes all the difference.
wolfpup's "whose shoes?" photo post from the recent con.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2011 1:44:57 pm PST #17919 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Is it wrong to want to date people based on their shoe choices alone? Some of those are hot. I have no idea who any of them are this time round (lots of chicks--at least I think so).
I want #4 for myself. #6 aren't bad. #7 in a pinch. #8 will do. #11 could work. #12 rock. #13 make me smile.
Guy in a meeting today was totally wearing a Balthazar watch. I didn't know I thought there was a Balthazar watch until I saw it. Very stylish dark metal on a wide leather band.
eta: pinkraygun says that demons aren't slutty to sleep with and the Hookman chick is probably dead, lol.
No, that's not a quote, and I am being unkind.