The actor who played Chuck's publisher was damned familiar
She was the lab chick on Jake 2.0, also. That is probably how I will always think of her.
The angels are extremely interesting all of a sudden. Castiel being all clever at getting around the rules and Zachariah, well, I'd think he was evil except no archangel showing up must mean he's not.
Oh, and I really wanted Chuck to answer Dean's "Slaughterhouse 5 or Cat's Cradle?" with Breakfast of Champions.
Oddly enough, quite a number of folks really hated the meta elements of the episode, particularly the bits at the beginning, with the fangirl and the slash.
That didn't bug me at all. Mind you, as soon as the comic shop guy said "Ohhhh, you're LARPers!", I nearly passed out from laughter.
I'm seeing a lot of Wincest 'shippers being upset about the episode (although I get the impression that perhaps a lot of them are not liking the season much?), whilst the Dean/Castiel people are all gleeful, for the most part. Which works for me.
Well, now we know for sure they aren't sleeping together.
Because, really, until now it was totally a possibility.
It totally was, ita. It was also a possibility that they rode unicorns when we weren't looking.
I feel kind of bad for them, in a OMGWTFRealityCheck kind of way. I mean, if you ARE calling yourself MrsDeanWinchester on a posting board, and madly shipping Dean/Sam, and have gone and got a tattoo, or whatever, then this is definitely a nasty little smackdown from your happy place.
Got to say, though, I do love the fact that SPN fandom is so avidly perverse with the Dean/Sam and the J2 stuff that they have
consciously introduced big gay angel slashbait
to try to distract the fangirls. This is
made of win!
...I'm
so
not a Dean/Sam shipper. Which is hilarious, since I am nevertheless writing Dean/Sam at present. And I'm going with it, because it makes sense for the story, but it definitely came along
despite
my expectations and predisposition, and took 35,000 words to happen. But still, I find myself writing Wincest. Which isn't my beautiful cake. It makes me oddly squirmy about some of the comments it's garnered (and some people's icons, even); on the one hand, I'm engaged with the story, and invested in it, and I think it makes a fucked up sense - but on the other hand I'm still squicked, generally speaking, by the idea of Dean/Sam. I remain a very hard sell on the pairing, and just don't see canon through that lens at all. So people being all "OMG Sam/Dean2getha4evah twu wuv yay!!!" have me just blinking at the screen and wondering how to react.
It's the weirdest experience, as a writer.Here I was playing around with the conceit of Dean being zapped with a gender switch curse a la Tieresias, mostly because I thought Girl!Dean would be hot like woah, and potentially comedy gold, only then it all snowballed and became more Greek by the moment, and the narrative was all pushy about wanting to go there, and - yeah.
Odd.
I was late starting the show, so, when I came in, they were talking to publisher-girl. Having seen the beginning, I can imagine not liking the ep as well after the uber-meta in the first couple scenes.
Loved every inch of the meta.
So, am confused. An archangel did "appear" at the end, right? Even though we didn't see him/her? Or was the archangel *about* to appear and Lilith hit the road before the road hit her?
The opening meta kind of put me off despite not being a Wincest shipper - combo of too much winking at the viewers in general and the fact that I cringe whenever the protagonists of a show go into a comic shop and have Comic Book Guy geek out on them.
I'd have been a lot happier if the guys had just been horrified by their lives being on display in a series of NC-17 Harry Dresden-style novels and not made all the meta-commentary about internet fandom.