Mal: Well, you were right about this being a bad idea. Zoe: Thanks for sayin', sir.

'Serenity'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


§ ita § - Nov 18, 2010 5:14:50 pm PST #15893 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That was watch from the hall from me more than anything else because I thought it was a grave tonal misstep (although I hated most of that ep). Molesting unattractive older woman just made me embarrassed for the people who thought that was funny.

I don't think soulless Sam would do her unless she could prove she was a tiger in the sack. I don't think it was scruples that was keeping his pants on before--it was fear of old lady cooties.


Amy - Nov 18, 2010 5:19:50 pm PST #15894 of 30002
Because books.

I don't think it was scruples that was keeping his pants on before--it was fear of old lady cooties.

Exactly. I think without scruples, Sam is going to be even choosier about looks over personality or charm, really.


Amy - Nov 18, 2010 5:22:14 pm PST #15895 of 30002
Because books.

I'm still dealing with Sam not needing to sleep.

I can get, sort of, how if you don't have a soul, you don't have any emotional conflicts, the kind your dreams work out for you.

But the body still needs rest. I would think he would sleep, just not dream. I keep wondering where they're going with that.


§ ita § - Nov 18, 2010 5:35:42 pm PST #15896 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

(Oh, and by unattractive I meant textually we were to understand this was obviously worse than, you know, fucking a werewolf or some shit)

Castiel teaser spot. Not spoilery at all, unless you mean spoilery in your pants if you love Cas. Aired during tonight's Vampire Diaries.


Morgana - Nov 18, 2010 6:27:11 pm PST #15897 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

I just see people invoking Changing Channels, and I'm like "No! Don't jinx it!"

I see almost universal love for this episode throughout the fandom, and at those times I realize once again that I don't share most everyone else's sense of humor. In particular I didn't find the sitcom or game show segments funny at all. But then I am also impatient with the Ghostbuster episodes too - I don't think I've watched any of them in reruns, because I didn't enjoy them enough the first time through.

Ben Edlund doesn't always thrill me but I've always been willing to give him a chance ever since "I'm made of felt... and my nothe cometh off."


Theresa - Nov 18, 2010 6:55:34 pm PST #15898 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"

Have we had any episodes by Carver this season? Or did we lose him to another show?


Laga - Nov 18, 2010 6:56:36 pm PST #15899 of 30002
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

I didn't love Changing Channels.


§ ita § - Nov 18, 2010 7:14:36 pm PST #15900 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Carver's gone over to Being Human.

I adored Changing Channels. LoveLOVElove. I laughed so hard, and felt all their pain and danced pantsless in the meta of the whole thing. But then again, he did Nightshifter and The End and I'd rather this not be a Malleus Maleficarum.


Morgana - Nov 18, 2010 7:31:09 pm PST #15901 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

I didn't love Changing Channels

A short while ago Polter-Cow linked this article with excerpts from the Season 5 Companion, where they talk specifically about Changing Channels. Quotes like "We were like, ‘How much crazier can this episode get?' but it always found a way to get one notch crazier. I think the Japanese game show just came out of a desire to watch the guys get hit in the balls. Purely juvenile." and the director and editor talking about how they were laughing so hard they were crying while working on the episode just made me think that it was like I was reading something that had been translated from another language. But then I never found the Three Stooges amusing either.


§ ita § - Nov 18, 2010 7:33:57 pm PST #15902 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Not a big fan of the Three Stooges. HUGE fan of hitting guys in the nuts. Worked for me, especially with the counterpoint of the emotional questions they were being asked in a foreign language to make it even high stakes and sad, and the introduction of the derisive term "pretty boy angel".