I think I'll choose something else to spend the next several hours with.
I'm a live-and-let-live kinda gal, but... wow. ::boggles:: Mind if I join you, Morgana?
River: The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems. Mal: See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like.
'Safe'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Marcia - Jul 27, 2010 5:10:28 pm PDT #12290 of 30002
Kneel before Glod. ~Stephen Colbert
§ ita § - Jul 27, 2010 5:12:46 pm PDT #12291 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Dear lord. To counter that, maybe a little, I just read an AU (non big bang) where the author also said she didn't know what she was talking about. Unsaid, a PG-13 D/C AU by liadan14, where Dean is deaf and Castiel is mute. I can't vouch for any accuracy about living with deafness, but the emotions are so charming and sweet that I at least hope for veracity.
Juliebird - Jul 27, 2010 5:19:43 pm PDT #12292 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
Ooh, I really liked Unsaid.
Morgana - Jul 27, 2010 5:36:46 pm PDT #12293 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber
Mind if I join you, Morgana?
Not at all. It's a nice soft cushy bench with lots of pillows and regular visits by waiters who wander by with iced tea and cookies.
§ ita § - Jul 27, 2010 5:44:06 pm PDT #12294 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Ugh. Is the assumption, then, that at least one of the pairings listed is performing the non-con on a minor? I know RPF readers, especially AU, are not thinking of people, but it's like the slavery AUs for me. I just...I can't even read the summary comfortably.
Morgana - Jul 27, 2010 6:00:23 pm PDT #12295 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber
ita, that would be my assumption, that either Richard Speight or Frederic Lehne possibly both are involved in non-con with the minor version of Jared. And yeah, that hits my squick meter really, really high.
§ ita § - Jul 27, 2010 6:03:55 pm PDT #12296 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
::shudder::
I just want to drown myself in schmoop. I wouldn't be reading that if it were set inside the show universe, but putting real people's names on it just wigs me out more.
Marcia - Jul 27, 2010 6:32:03 pm PDT #12297 of 30002
Kneel before Glod. ~Stephen Colbert
...putting real people's names on it just wigs me out more
Yup. Squick meter is definitely redlining.
Laga - Jul 27, 2010 7:59:51 pm PDT #12298 of 30002
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
Hey, I'm at my parents' house and they've gone to bed. If anybody wants to post pictures of twinky JA that aren't already on provacateuse I wouldn't mind at all. Did I mention I had a lot of riesling with dinner?
Cass - Jul 28, 2010 7:12:29 pm PDT #12299 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
From way back because I sort of started the mess...
But I still feel at a loss for regular recurrings. It leaves Bobby verboten for discussion, and that feels like a big hole for the show thread.
Why would discussing Bobby be verboten? We know we exists, so we can speculate. I mean, sure, we can't say, "Woo! Bobby will be back!" as a regular recurring or something, but we can skate around it by just... talking non-specific, unspoiled speculation about what they could do with Bobby, if they should choose to bring Bobby back again.
Enough spoiled people talking and you do know who is going to be back or not, directions that things are going, that stuff. It's like the cut tags on LJ that spell out way too much in the cut text.
For me, if it's in white, I can avoid it. It's where the discussion creeps out from there that I start getting uncomfortable. Which, I realize, is not our actual rules. Just me stating where I could easily see a middle ground if we wanted to talk about one.
I am one of those insanely unspoiled people and I prefer this show that way. I don't want to know ep titles and all of that. I don't know who will be back or not. I don't follow the actors or crew on Twitter just so I can stay that way.
(Well, except for Misha because I'll forgive him for spoiling me to Jim Beaver appearances to name one instance just so I can, you know, be oh so amused by his Mishaness. But I know that by clicking Follow, I am risking it. It's a risk I take because he's adorable.)
...
Is hiatus over yet?
Now?
Phooey.