My work's illegal, but at least it's honest.

Mal ,'Shindig'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Morgana - Jul 27, 2010 5:36:46 pm PDT #12293 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

Mind if I join you, Morgana?

Not at all. It's a nice soft cushy bench with lots of pillows and regular visits by waiters who wander by with iced tea and cookies.


§ ita § - Jul 27, 2010 5:44:06 pm PDT #12294 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Ugh. Is the assumption, then, that at least one of the pairings listed is performing the non-con on a minor? I know RPF readers, especially AU, are not thinking of people, but it's like the slavery AUs for me. I just...I can't even read the summary comfortably.


Morgana - Jul 27, 2010 6:00:23 pm PDT #12295 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber

ita, that would be my assumption, that either Richard Speight or Frederic Lehne possibly both are involved in non-con with the minor version of Jared. And yeah, that hits my squick meter really, really high.


§ ita § - Jul 27, 2010 6:03:55 pm PDT #12296 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

::shudder::

I just want to drown myself in schmoop. I wouldn't be reading that if it were set inside the show universe, but putting real people's names on it just wigs me out more.


Marcia - Jul 27, 2010 6:32:03 pm PDT #12297 of 30002
Kneel before Glod. ~Stephen Colbert

...putting real people's names on it just wigs me out more

Yup. Squick meter is definitely redlining.


Laga - Jul 27, 2010 7:59:51 pm PDT #12298 of 30002
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

Hey, I'm at my parents' house and they've gone to bed. If anybody wants to post pictures of twinky JA that aren't already on provacateuse I wouldn't mind at all. Did I mention I had a lot of riesling with dinner?


Cass - Jul 28, 2010 7:12:29 pm PDT #12299 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

From way back because I sort of started the mess...

But I still feel at a loss for regular recurrings. It leaves Bobby verboten for discussion, and that feels like a big hole for the show thread.

Why would discussing Bobby be verboten? We know we exists, so we can speculate. I mean, sure, we can't say, "Woo! Bobby will be back!" as a regular recurring or something, but we can skate around it by just... talking non-specific, unspoiled speculation about what they could do with Bobby, if they should choose to bring Bobby back again.

Enough spoiled people talking and you do know who is going to be back or not, directions that things are going, that stuff. It's like the cut tags on LJ that spell out way too much in the cut text.

For me, if it's in white, I can avoid it. It's where the discussion creeps out from there that I start getting uncomfortable. Which, I realize, is not our actual rules. Just me stating where I could easily see a middle ground if we wanted to talk about one.

I am one of those insanely unspoiled people and I prefer this show that way. I don't want to know ep titles and all of that. I don't know who will be back or not. I don't follow the actors or crew on Twitter just so I can stay that way.

(Well, except for Misha because I'll forgive him for spoiling me to Jim Beaver appearances to name one instance just so I can, you know, be oh so amused by his Mishaness. But I know that by clicking Follow, I am risking it. It's a risk I take because he's adorable.)

...

Is hiatus over yet?

Now?

Phooey.


P.M. Marc - Jul 28, 2010 7:29:23 pm PDT #12300 of 30002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Enough spoiled people talking and you do know who is going to be back or not, directions that things are going, that stuff. It's like the cut tags on LJ that spell out way too much in the cut text.

I should point out, I'm not a spoiled person. I just take Bobby as a given at this point. Bobby specifically, that is.

Other recurrings NSM. Like, Bobby might as well be in the regular credits, they use him so much. But much as I'd love to see MOAR RUFUS? Rufus talk isn't... obvious like Bobby talk.

I mean, it's all kinda moot if people actually follow the rules and no hint of an actual spoiler comes through, even in font of white.


Cass - Jul 28, 2010 7:48:30 pm PDT #12301 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

I should point out, I'm not a spoiled person.

Actually I quoted you because I knew you're not and thus hoped to sidestep any unintended accusations.

Frankly, I'm not looking at anyone all shifty-eyed or saying we need to follow our rules to the letter so much as, dude, whitefont the stuff that isn't maybe supposed to be here so I, and others if they choose, can avoid it. I'm a font of white fan.

I just take Bobby as a given at this point. Bobby specifically, that is.

I was willing to give him up to save the car. I really like the car.

Once this show is off of the air, I am so resubscribing to Spoilers and Lite. I read up to where finale talk ended and then backed back out this summer. I miss Spoilers. And Lite.


§ ita § - Jul 29, 2010 8:20:55 am PDT #12302 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

D/C big bang alert: [link] I haven't read it, so I have no rec or anti rec. Just a heads up.