May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.

Mal ,'Bushwhacked'


Natter 62: The 62nd Natter  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


lisah - Dec 16, 2008 9:34:20 am PST #6405 of 10002
Punishingly Intricate

SF cold weather definitely feels "colder" than other places I've been. I think it's the dampness - the cold gets in deeper somehow.

That and many of the houses / apartment buildings aren't really insulated or heated efficiently at all. Our place had electric heater units in the front room and in the back bedroom (of a 4 bedroom railroad flat) and no storm windows. That first winter I was there we all piled into the one heated bedroom to sleep.


tommyrot - Dec 16, 2008 9:40:21 am PST #6406 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

That and many of the houses / apartment buildings aren't really insulated or heated efficiently at all. Our place had electric heater units in the front room and in the back bedroom (of a 4 bedroom railroad flat) and no storm windows. That first winter I was there we all piled into the one heated bedroom to sleep.

The first year I lived in SF, I was amazed at how expensive it was to heat our apartment. (We ended up just not using the heat.) It reminded me of the bills we had heating a house in Madison when we had that winter with all that below zero weather. Except it was 40s-50s in San Francisco. That place had no insulation, single-pane windows that let tons of air leak past....


DavidS - Dec 16, 2008 9:43:45 am PST #6407 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Yeah, we have one heater for the apartment and that's in the living room. It does nothing for the rest of the house.


tommyrot - Dec 16, 2008 9:44:56 am PST #6408 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Some gloom-n-doom from 60 Minutes: A Second Mortgage Disaster On The Horizon?

Interesting and depressing article. My main question is, why did so many people assume that housing prices would just keep going up?


Tom Scola - Dec 16, 2008 9:48:36 am PST #6409 of 10002
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

The NYC snow has calmed down a bit, but when it started those were the biggest "flakes" I have ever seen. It looked like cotton balls falling from the sky! Now it just looks like snow.

Giant snowflakes.

My main question is, why did so many people assume that housing prices would just keep going up?

Because since WWII, while housing prices might have gone down in certain regions of the country, housing prices nationwide never have gone down.


DavidS - Dec 16, 2008 9:53:03 am PST #6410 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

My main question is, why did so many people assume that housing prices would just keep going up?

Irrational exuberence.

It all reminds me of the dotcom bust and all the articles postulating that it was a new and unprecented economy which would never come down.

I mean they've been talking about a "real estate bubble" for about five years. From what I've learned just from this latest crash, it was not hard to see or anticipate how this would all go down. You keep lowering interest rates and overextend credit and this is what happens.

I think our biggest problem to face with Econ 101 is going to be the national debt. They just can't go on as they've gone on, and if China pulled in all its vouchers then there'd really be a problem.

Frankly, the mortgage crisis is as nothing compared to what could happen in that eventuality.

Of course, the Chinese would not benefit from that scenario so it's less likely. And yet, it's not hard to imagine circumstances where they might think it beneficial to drop an economic bomb. I can kind of see it as an economic nuclear threat, built around the gamble that China could recover more quickly and dominate the market the way the U.S. has. Five to ten years of economic mayhem and they come out on top. That sort of thing.


tommyrot - Dec 16, 2008 9:56:43 am PST #6411 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Because since WWII, while housing prices might have gone down in certain regions of the country, housing prices nationwide never have gone down.

Yeah, I get that, but housing prices since 2000-ish suddenly were rising far faster than before (when they pretty much followed inflation, right?) Shouldn't a lot of people at least considered the possibility that housing was in the midst of a bubble?

I've been curious about the various ratings agencies that gave AAA ratings to CDOs of subprime mortgages. It turns out that one of these ratings agencies had modeling software for CDOs that couldn't even accept a negative number for the appreciation of property values. IOW, their models were physically incapable of evaluating falling housing prices.


Fred Pete - Dec 16, 2008 9:58:14 am PST #6412 of 10002
Ann, that's a ferret.

It all reminds me of the dotcom bust and all the articles postulating that it was a new and unprecented economy which would never come down.

I think it's this. The "this time it's different" syndrome.

Of course, the Chinese would not benefit from that scenario so it's less likely.

I think I'll start whimpering anyway.


tommyrot - Dec 16, 2008 10:00:26 am PST #6413 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Irrational exuberence.

Yeah. I'm just surprised that maybe 99% in the real estate/mortgage/financial businesses succumbed to it.

It all reminds me of the dotcom bust and all the articles postulating that it was a new and unprecented economy which would never come down.

Yeah, I remember all that. It seems as if the media was just in the business of telling people what they wanted to hear. (Dow 36,000?)


DavidS - Dec 16, 2008 10:06:33 am PST #6414 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Yeah. I'm just surprised that maybe 99% in the real estate/mortgage/financial businesses succumbed to it.

But, they made a lot of money in the short term. Same for the law firms that have gone under in SF. The ones that went down were the ones raking it in on the short term economic climate, and then got hammered when the winds shifted.

So the motive is the same as it ever was: profit.

Or as erika will tell ya, crime greed makes you stupid.