Yes, but he did not stay with me last year.
And 2008 will forever be the year Suzi left us.
::sniff::
Host ,'Why We Fight'
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon.
Yes, but he did not stay with me last year.
And 2008 will forever be the year Suzi left us.
::sniff::
Aaaaaand I don't have to fly to the UK (and disrupt my entire life) this Thursday, so I will indeed be around when Scola is here. But I will be working 14-20 hours a day until the morning of the 19th.
Oh my god, I suck.
So - June 26-28, July 10-12, and June 19-21 are the run-off dates. Shall we have people pick their first, second, and third choices, and then weight accordingly?
I think there should perhaps be the chance to include 'can't attend', because I think there's a difference between 'not my favourite, but I can do' and 'impossible', which should maybe be taken into account in the weighting?
For the runoff, would it make more sense to just vote yes/no on the dates, and then go with whichever one gets the most yes votes? I'm not really sure, just putting out an option.
I tend to agree with Hil. Of course, mathier minds may have other opinions.
Hil's suggestion works for me - I just wasn't comfortable with weighting 'not possible' and 'not my favourite' the same.
We could have a "is there a day you CAN'T attend" box. That way, if its close we'd have a tie-breaker.
But that's covered if you tick yes or no for each date, surely? You might tick three yeses, or two, or one? Or did I misunderstand?
But that's covered if you tick yes or no for each date, surely? You might tick three yeses, or two, or one?
That's what I was figuring. "Yes" for can attend, "no" for can't attend, and maybe a "which is your first choice?" as a tiebreaker, if the can/can't attend vote is a tie.