WANT SWAG!

omgomgomgomgomg

Yes, it's finally, really, sinking in.

I'm really hoping for a landslide too. I'm quite concerned about the election being decided by litigation.

I'm trying not to think about it.

Java, insent.

I'm trying not to think about it.

Same.

I never know what the lines will be like at my precinct. It's always been pretty random. The election officials are telling people to aim to go between 10 and 4, when it is less busy. Uh, yeah. Because that's usually the least convenient time for people. That's why we want early voting!

Oh, and I heard something interesting: Maryland is planning on returning to paper ballots for the 2010 election cycle.

Anne, swung back atcha.

Sox, yes, I was supposed to be there last week, in fact. But the NDA project went so over due to all of the software problems, that I didn't get to go (couldn't register/book flights until NDA was done, and then it was too late). I am still hoping to get back East, but am waiting for another project to be futher defined (timelines wise) before I can try and schedule it. I really want to do a 4-5 trip back East hitting both New York and Philly. Also, I am really spread thin financially right now, so I have to factor that in. Without work paying for me to come back East, it's a little harder to swing.

However, I am going to a conference in San Diego next week, and my consolation prize (which is pretty damned sweet) is getting to see ND, Kristin, Cupcake Goth and her adorable husband.

Maryland is planning on returning to paper ballots for the 2010 election cycle.

Are you on touchscreens now? We've had the scan-tron kind of paper ballots for years, and I can't see why any place wouldn't see it as the best of both worlds. All the advantages of computerized systems for instant counting, with the actual original marked-by-the-voter's-own-hand ballot right there if a backup is needed.

Yeah. There was a big overhaul to get the whole state on touchscreen, with no paper trail...and now they're chucking it. Apparently, they'll still be paying for the touchscreens years after they stop using them.

I'm all for it.

We've had the scan-tron kind of paper ballots for years, and I can't see why any place wouldn't see it as the best of both worlds. All the advantages of computerized systems for instant counting, with the actual original marked-by-the-voter's-own-hand ballot right there if a backup is needed.

I have read that this is the system that is really catching on right now. I've had that system for years and I really like it.

I think that's what we're moving to.

A nice little anecdote for some of you worried about Prop 8 here in California:

You might be heartened to know that one of my staff, who is registered to vote for the first time since he became a citizen (we talk a lot of politics at work, so he overhears) is a fundamentalist Christian. He's a sweet guy, pretty bright, but tends to make up his mind about stuff with a naive approach. I do know he's voting for Obama, and yesterday he asked me about the wording of Prop 8 (I had printed out the voter guides for a bunch of people in the office who had registered late and not yet received the guides). I have to be really careful, because I am his manager, and I also don't want to offend his religious opinions. Anyway, he asked me "why, if the CA Supreme Court had already decided this, it was on the ballot - wouldn't it just go back and forth every 4 years?" So I showed him the wording of the proposition, and how it would actually amend the State constitution. His response astounded me: "well just because I believe marriage is for man and wife, doesn't mean I think the constitution should be changed. It's not like gays are trying to say that marriage should only be between gay people, right? Because that would be wrong. So if they're not trying to take away my rights, why do I care about taking away theirs?"

I almost fainted with joy. And maybe he's not the only one.