She's still not wrong.
Love ya, babe.
pffft
What you did to me was unbelievable, Connor. But then I got stuck in a hell dimension by my girlfriend one time for a hundred years, so three months under the ocean actually gave me perspective. Kind of a M.C. Escher perspective, but I did get time to think.
Angel ,'Conviction (1)'
Natter 61*
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Lee - Oct 22, 2008 12:51:47 pm PDT #5912 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
Gudanov - Oct 22, 2008 12:58:37 pm PDT #5913 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping
"When Palin does it she gets a hundred and fifty grand in clothes..."
I find that story pretty amusing. I'm sure Palin personally didn't have a lot to do with spending $150,000 on clothes and accessories in September. But really? $5,000 a day in September? When the campaign's message is that Palin is "one of us"?
Barb - Oct 22, 2008 1:06:00 pm PDT #5914 of 10001
“Not dead yet!”
But really? $5,000 a day in September? When the campaign's message is that Palin is "one of us"?
Well, if she was really "one of us," as in the majority of the "real Americans" she purports to speak to, I'm sure they could've found a JCPenney's or if she was goin' high class, a Talbot's at which to outfit her.
Mind you, I could do some serious damage at Needless Markup, mostly in shoes, but I'm not trying to appeal to Middle America.
Cashmere - Oct 22, 2008 1:12:30 pm PDT #5915 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.
Of course I think the amount Palin spent on clothes is ridonkulous for a Joanna Six-Pack BUT I'm figuring they were outfitting the entire clan--five kids, plus Levi plus Todd. And her stuff would be suits, shoes and coats which are spendy even at sale prices.
My eyes aren't bulging over the amount but I'm laughing at the irony of this picture: [link]
Sheryl - Oct 22, 2008 1:18:32 pm PDT #5916 of 10001
Fandom means never having to say "But where would I wear that?"
Timelies all!
G is back from a business trip to Chicago. Friday we head out to OVFF. Busy, busy....
Sheryl - Oct 22, 2008 1:18:38 pm PDT #5917 of 10001
Fandom means never having to say "But where would I wear that?"
tommyrot - Oct 22, 2008 1:27:34 pm PDT #5918 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
BUT I'm figuring they were outfitting the entire clan--five kids, plus Levi plus Todd.
I saw a breakdown - almost all of it is for Palin.
aurelia - Oct 22, 2008 1:32:27 pm PDT #5919 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
People Magazine: Do you think you're intellectual?
Sarah Palin: Yehhh-sss.
Those darn gotcha journalists and their trick questions.
My eyes aren't bulging over the amount but I'm laughing at the irony of this picture: [link]
Ha! As long as the RNC is buying the wardrobe I don't really care. It sounds like the state of Alaska has some questions about travel expenses though.
Cashmere - Oct 22, 2008 1:35:52 pm PDT #5920 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.
I saw a breakdown - almost all of it is for Palin.
Ouch. Of course, I think Cindy McCain spent that much on ONE OUTFIT for the GOP Convention. They have a different perspective, I'm pretty sure.
I also think it's funny that the RNC is trying to spin it by saying she's going to donate the clothes to charity after the election. Ha!
Barb - Oct 22, 2008 1:37:52 pm PDT #5921 of 10001
“Not dead yet!”
Thing is, too-- they're idiots. The real trick is in accessories. They really could have made her look every bit as good shopping at Ann Taylor loft or even Target (they were in Minneapolis, for God's sake!), with some basic pieces, and then picking up some really nice, high end accessories and a few really good pairs of shoes, a good Raymond Weil or Movado watch, and choose a signature piece of jewelry and she'd have been set.