I want an electric car. I wonder how much they're going to be?
Natter 60: Gone In 60 Seconds
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I love that it's called the "Volt". .. like the Colt but electric.
Or maybe not.
Oh, maybe Ford will make a "Watt".
I want an electric car. I wonder how much they're going to be?
I doubt it will be affordable for most people (including me alas), too many batteries. I just hope it lives up to GM's press. I want this sort of vehicle to catch on so the prices can be driven down.
Introducing the Infiniti Ampere.
Our firm is converting from Lotus notes to Outlook, so today I have to go spend an hour and a half in a class about being converted.
I don't think there's enough coffee in the world.
This version of the Volt article is paginated and has a different photo of the car on each page. It does look cool, but 40 miles on one charge and then 300 miles on electricity generated from gas...well, it's quasi all-electric, but leaves me confused. Is there an edge given by those 40 miles?
Most people drive fewer than 40 miles each days. And IC engines are so inefficient that it takes less fossil fuel and fewer emissions to drive a mile on electricity than a mile on even the most efficient gasoline car even when the electricity is generate from fossil fuels. Plus if we want to we can completely decarbonize the grid and make it 95% plus wind, solar, hydro and geothermal.
The thing I don't get is why oil companies aren't very publicly pumping umpteen billions of the profits they're making into renewable energy technology. We're going to have to switch sooner or later, and having the setup in place for widespread manufacture of company-controlled windmill fields and solar panels would ensure that they'd still be making money in the energy business long after the oil gets too scarce to be a practical energy source.
The thing I don't get is why oil companies aren't very publicly pumping umpteen billions of the profits they're making into renewable energy technology.
Because, as the current economic crisis shows (to name just one example,) people are stupid, greedy, shortsighted, and averse to change until everything comes crashing down around them.
Petroleum is a vile substance, that corrupts the souls of everyone who deals with it.
Except the Norwegians, for some reason.
The thing I don't get is why oil companies aren't very publicly pumping umpteen billions of the profits they're making into renewable energy technology.
They are pumping a lot of money into the renewable energy sector, but their board members and shareholders have seen the craze for renewables come and go before, and a lot of them remain unconvinced that changing course like this is the best way to go. Scalability is still a huge issue, environmental factors loom large (like, say, wind turbine fields killing scores of birds), and the U.S. government has removed tax credits for developing renewable energy. A lot of this really does have to do with the government - if there was a program in place to strenuously encourage renewable-energy development, we'd be seeing a lot more movement in that area (like Spain has). As it is, we're dependent on wealthy people like T. Boone Pickens and Vinod Kohsla to get that ball rolling.
Also, people really are adverse to change. But if the money is there, they'll go for it.