Come on. You drop by for a cup of coffee, and the world's not ending? Please.

Connor ,'Not Fade Away'


Boxed Set, Vol. V: Just a Hint of Denial and a Dash of Retcon  

A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.

Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.

Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.

Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.

This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.


Shir - Apr 18, 2009 11:07:47 pm PDT #7962 of 30001
"And that's why God Almighty gave us fire insurance and the public defender".

Dr. Who has been on tv (with a 15-year gap) since 1963.

Oh, I knew that. I just thought the new series was designed so that new people (like me. Only on earth since 1985, so, you know, no chance I could watch it in real time) could get into it without too much effort. It seemed, to a new series only watcher, that the time lords can't alter their regeneration, that's all. I knew I'll have to watch the old series sometime... humm. Maybe now.

there is NO WAY canon was going to give Rose and The Doctor a happy ending

Exactly. Star crossed lovers means you never get a happy ending. And I'm OK with that. In the end, with all of his decision making for others, the Doctor is the one who is making himself be alone. And for that, he can kiss my ass. He's responsible for this.

And thanks for the link!


Shir - Apr 18, 2009 11:27:01 pm PDT #7963 of 30001
"And that's why God Almighty gave us fire insurance and the public defender".

Oh, that vid was beautiful. And not helping me much with my DT crush.

I usually dislike fanvids - I know it's a matter of taste, but I hate most of the music the fans attach to it, and it makes it ridicules to me. I mean, how many My Immortal Buffy fanvids are there, dammit? Where ever I go, I seem to fall on yet another B/S fanvid with this song. So I find it hard to take most of them seriously (which doesn't mean I don't appreciate or see the effort that was made while making it).


WindSparrow - Apr 19, 2009 3:51:09 am PDT #7964 of 30001
Love is stronger than death and harder than sorrow. Those who practice it are fierce like the light of stars traveling eons to pierce the night.

I just thought the new series was designed so that new people (like me. Only on earth since 1985, so, you know, no chance I could watch it in real time) could get into it without too much effort. It seemed, to a new series only watcher, that the time lords can't alter their regeneration, that's all. I knew I'll have to watch the old series sometime... humm. Maybe now.

I think moments like that are meant to make the new viewer ask... so that it lures you into watching the historical Who. I'd love for you to do a watch-and-post. And then see you go back and re-watch the new stuff. I can't say much of what I expect from your reaction, without spoiling it - I suppose, other than how brilliantly Tennant has blended historical elements with the newer face of Who. You can look forward to saying, "OH! So that's why...." more than a few times.

Have you had the opportunity to see any of the Children In Need mini-specials?


Barb - Apr 19, 2009 5:18:36 am PDT #7965 of 30001
“Not dead yet!”

I end up in such weird places, shipper-wise. I'm never in tune with anyone else. Since I didn't start watching Buffy until after Angel premiered (which I started watching because of dear, departed Glenn Quinn), I had no emotional investment in Buffy/Angel. I could care less. I did, however, hate the thought of Angel/Cordy because the writers completely mucked that up-- all through S2 of Angel, they'd been weaving the threads together for a really lovely return to Cordy/Wes and then they completely went off course. (I will say, however, I adored morally!ambiguous! Wes with Lilah).

Which is a roundabout way of saying, I never got into the whole Rose/Doctor thing. I didn't start rewatching Who with any regularity until partway through S3-- the times I saw Rose and of course, then with Martha, there was just too much hero worship going on. There's already an inherent imbalance going on, what with him being a Time Lord-- no need to make it worse. Which is why Donna was just the absolute perfect companion. She was in awe of what he was able to show her, the things he was able to do, but she was never in awe of him. She was the closest thing to an equal that I think he encountered (outside of perhaps River Song, but we don't really know enough about her).

At the same time, however, I can't see them as a "couple." Companions, yes--they were splendid that way-- she completed him and was his human side moreso than Rose or Martha-- but it couldn't have gone on forever because the Doctor knows it ultimately wouldn't have fulfilled her. She deserves to have a real life.

I think, in a way, losing Donna is ultimately more heartbreaking to him than losing Rose.


Nora Deirdre - Apr 19, 2009 5:39:15 am PDT #7966 of 30001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I'd like to see what I can do with a Donna coming into her own without the Doctor's influence.

Isn't this what Turn Left was about?

I thought Turn Left was a very clever foreshadowing of what would her fate would be. It's comforting, in a way. She really *doesn't* need the Doctor to be brave and caring and empathetic and full of humor and courage. She made hard choices and sacrificed herself, never having met the Doctor, only this crazy woman who said that there was a chance for a better world.

But not as much as she'll ever be alive, with the Doctor.

Remind me again, why did he say not to say anything to her, after getting her back home? Because to me, take away from her the hope that she can be someone better is horrible.

I honestly do not agree with this. I really believe that she has the inherent character to be awesome with or without that skinny spaceman. She IS ALREADY "someone better."

But to answer your question, the Doctor's reasoning to keep this entirely from her was because any memory of it would trigger the life-ending brain 'splosion that he was trying to save her from.


Shir - Apr 19, 2009 6:55:35 am PDT #7967 of 30001
"And that's why God Almighty gave us fire insurance and the public defender".

Have you had the opportunity to see any of the Children In Need mini-specials?

Eh, I think not. I saw something like this on the YouTubes, but always ignored it. Should I not?

I'd love for you to do a watch-and-post

I'd love to do so myself, but I'll have to get the Old Who first.

too much hero worship going on

Yes, this, too. But somehow, since I myself have a crush on him, I don't care about this side of the Doctor that much. Though, at some point, I thought it would be great to see a companion who isn't totally in love with the Doctor from the first moment.

She made hard choices and sacrificed herself, never having met the Doctor, only this crazy woman who said that there was a chance for a better world.

I'm thinking Giles, at The Wish, when Anyanka asks him why he thinks the other world is such a great place. He replies "because it has to be", or something like that, and I watched it as one of the most powerful moments of BtVS. Because really, how can he know such a thing? I don't know if we, as humans, have this need for believing in something bigger, shinier, better versions of ourselves and the world, but I know I long for better. For things I never experienced myself. So... it's in there. Somewhere.

She IS ALREADY "someone better."

I don't question Donna's quality. But she herself, even with the life-ending brain 'splosion, wanted to stay with him, as is. She was having fun.

So, in a way, I'm glad the season ended with Donna seems to be having fun, with or without the Doctor.


WindSparrow - Apr 19, 2009 7:16:22 am PDT #7968 of 30001
Love is stronger than death and harder than sorrow. Those who practice it are fierce like the light of stars traveling eons to pierce the night.

I saw something like this on the YouTubes, but always ignored it. Should I not?

They should definitely be seen. They are just a few minutes long, in between official seasons, little moments that add to the canon of the official seasons. There is one where Tennant's Doctor interacts with an earlier Doctor - and for just a few moments the Tenth Doctor speaks for all the fans, and especially for Tennant himself.


Maysa - Apr 19, 2009 9:00:01 am PDT #7969 of 30001

the times I saw Rose and of course, then with Martha, there was just too much hero worship going on. There's already an inherent imbalance going on, what with him being a Time Lord-- no need to make it worse. Which is why Donna was just the absolute perfect companion. She was in awe of what he was able to show her, the things he was able to do, but she was never in awe of him.

De-lurking to say - I feel the exact same way about Rose and the Doctor. I think this is really shown in the Stolen Earth and Journey's End with the repeated dialog about all of his companions being his "children". I have no problem with Rose getting the 10.5 version, because I can't picture the real Doctor and Rose ever having a sexual relationship (which I think she wanted). It's just too much like a father/daughter thing for me. But DT managed to make 10.5 seem very young and very different - so when he kissed her, it didn't squick me out (which I think it would have with the Doctor Doctor).

I think, in a way, losing Donna is ultimately more heartbreaking to him than losing Rose.

Yeah - I think the Doctor always kind of expected to lose Rose, it was just too perfect and too magical. But he had a sort of bickering brother/sister relationship with Donna that was very earth-bound. It's one thing to accept the fact that you can't have a romantic relationship, it's another thing to know that your friendships are probably doomed too. Poor guy. I still kind of hate him for erasing her memories, though.


Laura - Apr 19, 2009 9:13:52 am PDT #7970 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

Watched Caprica this morning. Vague non-spoilery comments. I liked it enough to be interested in seeing more. It has an unique feel to it. At times it felt like 50s spy/cop drama, then 60s psychedelic sci-fi, with the music of a BSG feel. I am very interested in the story to follow this setup. Nothing bugged any more than the usual handwavium required with the science stuff.


DCJensen - Apr 19, 2009 9:41:28 am PDT #7971 of 30001
All is well that ends in pizza.

The Children in Need specials since 2005 have been canon, which is not necessarily so before then.