Easy Bake. Flop-a-palooza. Woosh. Pop. I don't skulk.

Angel ,'Shells'


Boxed Set, Vol. V: Just a Hint of Denial and a Dash of Retcon  

A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.

Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.

Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.

Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.

This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.


Jessica - Feb 15, 2009 4:10:19 am PST #6834 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I think it's safe to say we haven't met Daniel yet.


victor infante - Feb 15, 2009 5:49:08 am PST #6835 of 30001
To understand what happened at the diner, we shall use Mr. Papaya! This is upsetting because he's the friendliest of fruits.

Did we never twig that there was a number missing?

Actually, it's been driving me crazy for ages. Ask my wife if you don't believe me. When the almost-Final Four wee revealed I was like, "What? Still no Seven?" I think I even suspected at one point that the Sevens had been boxed. But gone works, too. Except ...

Who wrote the prophecies of Pythia? Who built the Statues of the Five? Who brought Starbuck back, and what's all this prophecy stuff around her?

A surviving "Seven" (Whether it's Starbuck, Starbuck's dad or what not) may go a long way toward answering some of those questions.


JenP - Feb 15, 2009 6:22:16 am PST #6836 of 30001

I am the opposite of Victor in that the math problem of Sharon being an eight and the Final Five equalling thirteen never even entered my brain. Which I find sort of frightening but mostly just really hilarious.

I don't think we've met Daniel yet, and I do think there will be a Starbuck connection.


Liese S. - Feb 15, 2009 6:55:34 am PST #6837 of 30001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I hope there's something that comes out of the Starbuck situation payoff, because I still mourn the pilot whose body went up in flames on that pyre. (Hee, I initially typed byre, which is apparently a cow barn and therefore a whole different vibe.)


Laura - Feb 15, 2009 7:10:24 am PST #6838 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

I'm convinced that we discussed the odd math of the final five and Sharon as an 8 back a while ago. And yet I am not quite up to searching.


Laura - Feb 15, 2009 7:46:01 am PST #6839 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

pink grapefruit

So I couldn't resist and searched a bit through Boxed Set III and found some interesting insight into the final five when first introduced a couple years ago.

sumi - Jan 29, 2007 7:05:15 am PST #5856 of 10001
You know -- there is also that thing they said about the final five and the one that they do not name. Or was Roslin talking about the gods that are venerated in the Temple of the Five? Is the one that they do not name the god of the Cylons?

Topic!Cindy - Mar 26, 2007 12:22:48 pm PDT #8736 of 10001
Right. I think Cally's baby might not be Chief's baby, though.

Topic!Cindy - Mar 26, 2007 12:57:28 pm PDT #8748 of 10001
Right now, I mostly find it interesting because there is a "final five." There are 12 in all, but Sharon/Boomer/Athena is number 8 -- which does seem to point to the direction that the numbering may not be in chronological order. I'm wondering Cavil through Boomer are numbers 2 through eight, and if Tigh through Tory are numbers 9 through 12 and if the last to be revealed will be number 1.

There was more mathy discussion, but those stood out to me. And Go Cindy with calling Chief's non daddy status.


JenP - Feb 15, 2009 11:07:33 am PST #6840 of 30001

Heh. I wonder whether I skipped that or read it and forgot. Well, it was two years ago, so I can forgive myself either way.


Kathy A - Feb 16, 2009 8:36:55 am PST #6841 of 30001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Mo Ryan at the Tribune has her usual post-BSG blog entry here, and a follow-up interview with the ep's writers (including Jane Espenson) here.

Read through the comments on that first post; there are some interesting ones, including a detailed timeline that a viewer has put together from all the exposition in the ep.


sumi - Feb 16, 2009 11:16:36 am PST #6842 of 30001
Art Crawl!!!

Did we talk about the possibility that the Head! characters are Daniel?


Juliebird - Feb 16, 2009 12:01:08 pm PST #6843 of 30001
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

I'm not sure, but I do recall reading a spoiler about one and/or the other.