Allo, my name is [unpronounceable Gallifreyan gibberish], you killed my TARDIS. Prepare to die!
Willow ,'Never Leave Me'
Boxed Set, Vol. V: Just a Hint of Denial and a Dash of Retcon
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
The "I'm sorry" bit makes me think it'll be something less happy than marriage....
I always have this weird feeling that she's affiliated with the Master somehow (or she was in her past). There are so many interesting ways her story could go. It would be fun/heartbreaking to watch the Doctor fall in love with her, but then meet her in her past where she doesn't love him at all. Whatever she is, I hope she's in lots more episodes because I really love Alex Kingston (way more than Amy Pond who I still don't get).
The episode where the Master was bargaining for a new regeneration cycle was "The Five Doctors." It was a special case, as he had merged with/taken over Nyssa's father and was arguably a new, composite being as a result.
At least three occurences that have happened in New Who could explain the Doctor getting more than the normal 12 regenerations even if that is a hard biological limitation of Time Lords in general: his absorption of all that psychic energy that he used to de-age himself in "Last of the Time Lords," briefly absorbing the power of the Time Vortex from Rose in "The Parting of the Ways," and intervention by BadWolf!Rose in that same episode .
Again though no real need to explain. Lots of stuff in the new series is not entirely consistent with original series. They don't have to bound by it.
Harumph. I think they do.
</curmudgeon>
Harumph. I think they do.
They already publicly said they're not following canon. I think they're good. We just have to get over it.
Lots of stuff in the new series is not entirely consistent with original series. They don't have to bound by it.
Yeah, as far as limited regenerations go I expect Steven Moffat will wave his hand at the audience and say, "This is not the canon you're looking for."
Lots of stuff in the new series is not entirely consistent with original series.
Like what else? (I haven't seen many "classic" Dr. Who episodes.)
Lots of stuff in the new series is not entirely consistent with original series. They don't have to bound by it.
Hmmm. Well, they are and they aren't. It doesn't need to be a straightjacket, but I can't see them outright defying the big things, either. But all that being said, I can see all sorts of ways around the situation, and frankly, canon's given them all sorts of escape hatches already.
From what I understand about the SJA things, it's an offhand comment, which means we only have the Doctor's word for anything. Which often is about as reliable as a used Buick.
The Doctor? An unreliable narrator? I am shocked! Shocked, I tell you!