'Time Bomb'
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
Yeah. Or film. Or something. Not really the most sensical episode they've done.
it didn't seem that they were the usual things that Torchwood chases down, either. Much more X-files off-arc than what I'd been getting used to.
why did I think that was the season finale? was it in Britain?
UK Season finale is this Friday. *sob!*
I think it was one dose of the applicable "Video killed the radio star"--moving pictures were their downfall, including the ability to record them on film.
The other side to that is that theis same recording preserves them--but only as long as the tape survives, and playing said tape can release them again.
It almost worked for me, but I just don't think of that sort of moving picture film much these days.
It almost worked for me, but I just don't think of that sort of moving picture film much these days.
Which, I think, was one of the points -- the medium that destroyed the Night Travelers or whatever they were called is itself in danger of destruction, which means that they'd be lost forever.
Buit yeah. Almost worked does it for me. In fact, it would have worked fine for me if it was on "Buffy," which allows magical logic more easily than the pseudoscientifc "Torchwood." Even when it's delving into mythology, such as with the faeries in "Small Worlds," there's always a "well, they're interdimensional beings that don't exist linearly in time and space." That's "Doctor Who" logic, and I can buy into it.
But there was an implied supernatural element here that through me a little. Although, for the most part, I enjoyed it just fine. Ianto's delight in the old movie house, particularly, was a lot of fun.
And this is evidently the season of dredging up Jack's past -- his Time Agency frenemy (to use a Stephen Colbert word); his brother, a marriage in his past ... now, a time spent as a carnie! Even Martha Jones, at least from the POV of the other Torchwood members, was a piece of Jack's past that they had not been privy to.
It almost worked for me, but I just don't think of that sort of moving picture film much these days.
Which, I think, was one of the points -- the medium that destroyed the Night Travelers or whatever they were called is itself in danger of destruction, which means that they'd be lost forever.
But yeah. Almost worked does it for me. In fact, it would have worked fine for me if it was on "Buffy," which allows magical logic more easily than the pseudoscientifc "Torchwood." Even when it's delving into mythology, such as with the faeries in "Small Worlds," there's always a "well, they're interdimensional beings that don't exist linearly in time and space." That's "Doctor Who" logic, and I can buy into it.
But there was an implied supernatural element here that threw me a little. Although, for the most part, I enjoyed it just fine. Ianto's delight in the old movie house, particularly, was a lot of fun.
And this is evidently the season of dredging up Jack's past -- his Time Agency frenemy (to use a Stephen Colbert word); his brother, a marriage in his past ... now, a time spent as a carnie! Even Martha Jones, at least from the POV of the other Torchwood members, was a piece of Jack's past that they had not been privy to.
I was just sad that it wasn't creepier. Carnival freaks chasing after you should totally have been creepier.
why did I think that was the season finale? was it in Britain?
The US has three more episodes to go.
I'm still wondering about the level of Ianto's investment. He seemed way weepy way fast.
I'm still wondering about the level of Ianto's investment. He seemed way weepy way fast.
Yeah, Ianto's that weird combination of strong reaction and obscured root cause, which I think is part of what makes him so compelling. There's always a sense of stiull waters running deep with him.
So we see the full-fledged delight in the old movies and old-time cinema, but get nothing about it's causes. Which with a lot of characters would annoy me, but with Ianto? It all kinda seems Ianto-ish.