I can take on 29 five year olds.
That sounds about right. I can fend off about twelve 9 to 10 year olds as experienced from various post game melees at Little League. (Tackle the Coach being a favorite activity.)
Using a smaller child as weapon is key.
Because you have moral qualms don't you, Jesse? It's ok, you can admit it here.
Because you have moral qualms don't you, Jesse? It's ok, you can admit it here.
Yes. Also because I'm untrained and out of shape.
Smay can take 3 more 5 year olds than ita?
I don't buy it.
I am also untrained and only of average shape so I'm going to go with the qualms. Also, that word is fun to say. Qualms, qualms, qualms, qualms.
Smay can take 3 more 5 year olds than ita?
It doesn't seem likely. But I did register as pure psychopath by their standards. Perhaps she has a moral center.
I can take 25! Clearly, I am not bloodthirsty enough.
I should work on that.
You're just a special kind of asshole, Hecubus.
23 five-year-olds. Since I'm not likely to have to deal with any, I think I'm safe ... although some of my co-workers ....
You're just a special kind of asshole, Hecubus.
I'm tellin' ya, in my kid rumpus experience you need to pick up a scrawny one and swing 'em around airplane style, then fling him into the pack. When you down a batch you just stomp and run.
Also I'm big on circling the perimeter and knocking off the stragglers.