Tom Scola! Time Out NY is looking for NYC photography: [link]
Natter 53: We could just avoid making tortured puns
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I don't want to bother looking it up, because he's excessively stupid, but how can something be plagarism when you attribute it to the source? It's not like you were talking about Paperdol's Law.
I'm unsure if that's okay, since I found it via google.
If he was trying to keep it a secret, he shouldn't have posted on the internet.
That having been said, I'd advise you to not bother. He's a guy who doesn't like your work, and has made some stupid accusations. It's very unlikely you'll change his mind or even the minds of his normal audience.
Got my chips, no thanks to you guys. On the way up in the elevator I head that Rosario Dawson should be approached for Friday or Saturday (her choice) and she has that poverty and that Latino thing.
Then someone mumbled Ed Norton's name and I didn't hear anything else...
No, I think that's wankerific, and he doesn't deserve that just for having an opinion that hurts my feelings. But I love you for offering.
This is not an opinion, this is a misstatement of fact. And accusing a writer of plagiarism is huge. I think that someone needs to respond. If that someone is me, that's cool. But, I won't be nice, so maybe Lee should do it.
I posted, and now am getting back to work now that I can concentrate, again.
Hi, I'm Allyson Beatrice.
I found this while pathetically vanity googling for reviews.
I'm sorry you hate my book, of course, but I expected some folks to hate it and others to love it or feel apathetic, blah blah criticism-cakes.
I'd just like to respond to your accusation of plagiarism.
I received written permission from both Snacky and Mike Godwin to use their "laws" in entirety.
The book might be shit, but it's not plagiarized shit.
Sorry for busting in on you. Also sorry that it seemed to be a painfully bad read for you.
Very good response.
I got called away, or else I would have said what Vortex did. (except that I was going to enlist Sparky's help, so it wouldn't be too nice). Not liking it is one thing, but the plagarism is a whole other thing.
I was going to enlist Sparky's help, so it wouldn't be too nice
Darn, missed a chance to be evil and/or watch Vortex let her lawyer-self loose.
paperdol, I think your response was perfect and what everyone else said.
paperdol, that is a very good response. If he tries to stir anything up in reply, or if he tries to flame bait you, ignore him.
Dude's got an axe.
No clue, but an axe.
"plagiarized" != using a cite, called out and pulled out as a cite, with no claims to ownership, and, in fact, all due credit given.
May his own efforts never, ever sell.
I like paperdol's response, and agree that nothing else needs to be said-- no need to turn this guy's lj into an f_w site. Even if his comments were not well-considered for an unlocked post.
ETA: or well-considered for a post calling out someone else's purported minor errors-- McKean's law comes to mind (probably the third-most cited law on the internet).