I like the way the walls go out. Gives you an open feeling. Firefly is a good design. People don't appreciate the substance of things. Objects in space. People miss out on what's solid.

Early ,'Objects In Space'


Natter 53: We could just avoid making tortured puns  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Atropa - Aug 02, 2007 10:00:28 am PDT #1955 of 10001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

shrift, I just sent some clicky-links to you.


§ ita § - Aug 02, 2007 10:02:03 am PDT #1956 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Monday was vintage pink cotton and lace sundress with medium heeled white sandals. Tuesday was vintage-inspired black dress with ballet flats. Wednesday was blue scooter dress with high heeled black sandals. Today is square-necked shiny black tank, maroon cardigan, jeans and ballet flats.

Tomorrow is so far a wide belt (maybe cincher), pencil skirt and cuban heel stockings an high-heeled t-strap MJs. Last week I wore a corset.

I will wear the corset with non-high necked tops. I don't think that's why I got the attention. I think it was my hips.

I have nipples. I wear bras. That's as much responsibility as I'm gonna take. Hiding them would be a trial.


bon bon - Aug 02, 2007 10:04:04 am PDT #1957 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

I think the big difference between the sexes, clothing-wise, is that women have more gradations to work with. Men basically have four levels -- suit, jacket, khakis, jeans/shorts. And there's a pretty clear delineation between each level. Women seem to have more subtle gradations to take advantage of or maneuver through, depending on whether you like the idea or not.

I think this is a good point, and why the dress code affects women in a seemingly unfair way. Also because sexiness is less of an issue with men in the office.


§ ita § - Aug 02, 2007 10:08:30 am PDT #1958 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Dress codes are so expensive for women. A good men's suit is expensive, but they last and don't look dated so soon. Not to mention how unnoted they can be. It makes the bare minimum for men cheaper than same for women.

And variety is cheaper for us.


Vortex - Aug 02, 2007 10:13:02 am PDT #1959 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I'm in education, but I tend to dress fairly business-like. Also, I sometimes go more casual in the summer (i.e. no hose) today, I am wearing a more casual outfit -- brown sleeveless top, black suit jacket, ankle length, flowy black skirt with brown leaves on it, black low heeled slides (closed toe).

For me, it's very much habit. In the law world, I tended to dress up because people assumed I was admin if I wasn't wearing a suit. (not that there's anything wrong with being an admin, but I went to law school and passed the bar, do not ask me to make your goddamned copies. it has happened). Here, I do it because I'm following my boss' example, and he wears a suit. I like suits, I don't find them uncomfortable at all, and I don't even mind hose if it's not too hot out. I generally wear flats, though. I own and occasionally wear heels if there's a meeting or a presentation or something.


Vortex - Aug 02, 2007 10:15:32 am PDT #1960 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Dress codes are so expensive for women. A good men's suit is expensive, but they last and don't look dated so soon. Not to mention how unnoted they can be. It makes the bare minimum for men cheaper than same for women.

not to mention that a man can just switch up a shirt and tie and wear the same suit three times in a week.


shrift - Aug 02, 2007 10:17:56 am PDT #1961 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Shoes confound me so.

Mm. Shooooooes. If only I could shop for some, but no, I'm so not allowed to spend any money.

shrift, I just sent some clicky-links to you.

EEEEEEEEEeeeee!!


Aims - Aug 02, 2007 10:19:29 am PDT #1962 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

I've often envied Joe in the mornings and his ease of getting work ready.

These khakis. This polo. Same shoes.

Where as for me, it's "Ok, this skirt and this top...wait...doesn't match. Where's the matching top? Fuck, dirty cause I wore it with jeans. Kay. These pants, and this top. Nope, this shirt is too short for these pants. Ok, this shirt. Nope, too bloated today. Finally, this shirt ok. These pants, this shirt. Shoes...shoes....ok, these shoes. Nope, heel falling off. These shoes - nope. Meeting today, should wear something more dress. These shoes? Scuffing on the side (color shoe with Sharpie). Scuffing fixed. Ok. Acessories...."


brenda m - Aug 02, 2007 10:21:00 am PDT #1963 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

I think Aimee's been spying on me in the morning.


Steph L. - Aug 02, 2007 10:22:48 am PDT #1964 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

guayaberas

I had to google this — I didn't realize those were a *specific* type of shirt, other than, say, "button-front, short-sleeve." Keen.