Gar: pretty much.

According to Fraser (The Golden Bough), Samhain is one of the four major Celtic fire festivals; it's the end of the year and the beginning of the next. It's not doom and death, it's passage into the new year. On the day of the dead, when the year too dies...

I admit that although I know how to pronounce a lot of Celtic words, I'd never heard Samhain pronounced--I just knew it likely wasn't Sam Hane. It sounded like they were talking about Sam Haine, the pizza delivery guy. Argh.

As for Uriel, I have a suspicion he's the Angel of Death. He's very Old Testament. Castiel's a bit more NT, the way he refers to "my father".

... which I also find slightly problematic. God is Our Father--father to humans. But angels are a different order, and I'm not sold on the concept of them calling their creator their father. That's too mortal for them.

Which is another problem I had with Castiel. Angels are emissaries and servants of God. They are a different order of being than humans and they don't, I think, have free will--or at least not the way we understand it. Free will is what makes us human, what makes us valuable--that we can choose evil as well as good. Castiel having doubts makes no sense to me.

OTOH, according to legend Lucifer was an angel who revolted, and you can't do that without doubts either. Except in this show they've told us that demons used to be people: does that mean angels did, too?

I dunno, man. The theology on this show really makes my head hurt. Victims get punished (like last week), damned souls can crawl out of Hell, God is ruthless and his messengers are racist, there is no grace or mercy in the universe, and demons used to be humans. It's so ... unforgiving. One moment of anger or resentment and you're damned forever, apparently.

I'm so glad I don't live in the Winchesters' world, and not just because I'd be a shitty hunter.

When your cosmology comes entirely from horror flicks and comic books by Vertigo, the universe is not a happy place.

Also, lacking in accuracy and filled to the brim with handwavium.

(Someone on the flist said she started to get into and fall for SPN when she realized that it was a tragedy. The more I think about it, the more she seems to be right.)

It pretty much started out as Moore's American Gothic and has ended up more like Hellblazer for the last couple of years.

Points to new tag: It's good to have a plan in place.

(Someone on the flist said she started to get into and fall for SPN when she realized that it was a tragedy. The more I think about it, the more she seems to be right.)

I've been thinking of it as a tragedy for awhile now. If nothing else, the audience getting catharsis through pity and fear.

We even got a micro-tragedy in the episode In the Beginning: The Tragedy of John and Mary.

If the hero is Sam, then the tragic mistake is using the demon powers for what he thinks is a noble cause but will ultimately be his undoing? Or if Dean is the hero, then what is his tragic mistake? Following his father's orders, and now his Father's orders? Did your lj friend expand upon why she felt it was a tragedy?

According to Fraser (The Golden Bough), Samhain is one of the four major Celtic fire festivals; it's the end of the year and the beginning of the next. It's not doom and death, it's passage into the new year. On the day of the dead, when the year too dies...

Right, but it's also the time of the year when people believe(d) that the veil between the worlds was breached. People welcomed their own dead, but disguised themselves in costumes, because they were afraid of any evil spirits that might be about.

Which is another problem I had with Castiel. Angels are emissaries and servants of God. They are a different order of being than humans and they don't, I think, have free will--or at least not the way we understand it. Free will is what makes us human, what makes us valuable--that we can choose evil as well as good. Castiel having doubts makes no sense to me.

OTOH, according to legend Lucifer was an angel who revolted, and you can't do that without doubts either.

I don't know about doubts, but you can't rebel without free will. You also cannot love withtout it. I've seen a lot of people mention that they think angels don't have free will, but that's never been my understanding. Like you, I interpret the Biblical version of angels to say they're of a totally different order. And it seems natural to me that their "faith" would be different, because the Bible seems to indicate they experience God more fully than humans do; that they're working on a different set of facts. So, if they have free will and use it to rebel against God, it seems to me it would be a more serious type of rebellion.

I don't think Castiel's doubts are doubts that God exists, and they may not even be regarding whether or not God is just. It seems to me that God (in the Supernatural 'verse) may operate on a need to know basis. I think Castiel is struggling because he doesn't know whether he's doing right or wrong. I don't know if I'm explaining any of this well, but I thought it was important when he told the Winchesters that angels are not omniscient.

Supernatural's angels seem like human soldiers in an earthly war, in a way. In war, a soldier doesn't know the Commander-in-Chief's and the Joint-Chiefs' and the Generals' entire plan. They have their assignments. They complete them. Castiel admits he doesn't know which order Dean was supposed give (smite the town, or save the town). He just prayed that Dean would try to save the town. Meanwhile, his very confident colleague is all for smiting the town. I think the doubts he's having center around his actions.

(Someone on the flist said she started to get into and fall for SPN when she realized that it was a tragedy. The more I think about it, the more she seems to be right.)

I think so too, but I am soft and want Kripke to soften it at the end, and not end it like a proper tragedy should end, because I'm immature and like happy endings.

I refrain from comment on my own maturity (because my inner jury is still out on that). I don't expect happy endings, and in most cases I think the reality of tragedy appeals more. But every once in a while, I want to believe in an earned positive resolution.

I think Castiel is struggling because he doesn't know whether he's doing right or wrong. I don't know if I'm explaining any of this well, but I thought it was important when he told the Winchesters that angels are not omniscient.

I totally agree with you, Cindy. It's just that this concept, that the angels have the same kind of doubts and uncertainties that humans do, and that they express them the same way--that interferes with my understanding of angels, based on 30-something years of active Catholicism and too much reading.

I do agree that the Rebellion of Lucifer pretty much presumes that angels have some form of free will, and I guess we have to go with that interpretation for the purposes of the show. But I still have a desire to see angels as terrifying beings full of majesty and power and righteousness, who are not human. Once you show them hunched over on their knees on a park bench, confessing to doubts and uncertainties, they lose some of their majesty.

With the way the angels are behaving, and the "testing" of Dean and Sam, I'm having massive Bab5 foreshadowing here. I hope Kripke et al. can pull it off.

Consuela I'm not sure if God's messengers are racist and carry the baggage of that word in this show, but more specist. I don't think we can draw a parallel to racism with Uriel referring to humans as mud monkeys. A person can refer to birds as "rats with wings" or hate snakes, and it not be a moral judgment.

I didn't think Castiel was becoming human by his comments any more than we anthropomorphize our pets or laptops. (what?) I still think of him as a righteous being emphasized with his statements to Dean at the end of the second episode. We just may get to see deeper into his complexities than we will get to see with Uriel.

Cindy is me, only articulate and shit.

I don't expect happy endings, and in most cases I think the reality of tragedy appeals more. But every once in a while, I want to believe in an earned positive resolution.

I am hoping for this as well, Beverly. In fact, I'm hoping this is a tragicomedy with all the switches from serious to comedy. It would allow a switch at the end, the softening, and ultimately, if not happy, a non tragic ending.

Again, I think a lot of this stems from the nature of the alternate universe. As Plei pointed out, Supernatural does NOT for the most part directly use classic mythology. It's source is both classic and contemporary horror, popular culture and urban myths in general. Also as I've said before that explains, though does not excuse, its gender and race issues. It's sources are deeply racist and sexist. It would take a real effort to avoid that creeping into the stories: an effort that really ought to have been made, but which someone only slightly clueless about such things might fail to make.

But I also think the world being a fundamentally unfair and tragic place may spring from the deeper sources. The idea of a fundamentally just universe where injustice in life is made up for in the next one is comparatively new. In mythologies where the living, the dead, gods, demons and spirits all interact in this life, where there is no real separation between this life and the next, there is very little room for justice or fairness. People laughed when Jimmy Carter said "Life isn't fair" not because anyone disagreed, but because he was stating the bleeding obvious. If the supernatural intervenes on a day-to-day basis, then it isn't fair either. (Even karma looked at closely is more about consequences than justice, especially in its older versions.)

I won't say the idea of an ultimately just universe requires dualism, a separation between the supernatural and material worlds, because sophisticated pagans do manage to reconcile closeness between the natural and supernatural with the idea of justice. But in general, TANJ and cosmic justice are a lot easier to reconcile in a world where the natural and supernatural are separate, especially where the realm of the dead has little contact with the realm of the living. A world where supernatural evils are free to do both physical and spiritual harm is far harder to reconcile with the moral core of, say, Christianity, than a universe which shows no signs of supernatural intervention in day-to-day life.