I agree.
'Out Of Gas'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Thanks for putting those numbers together, -t. P.-C. seems to have summed it up. Interesting.
Denise, if you don't think you can get here, email me. Maybe I can help. Heck, email me anyhow.
Cindy, is that also a ticky box?
It is now, Kat.
Er, where poll?
"There castle. There wolf."
Denise, if you don't think you can get here, email me. Maybe I can help. Heck, email me anyhow.
I will. You're on my list in between laundry and packing.
ok - here is the draft poll - up for comment for 24 hours (at least) - SHOULD I POST IT ANYWHERE ELSE?
Some Facts:
- There are 1547 activated registrations, 1177 who went on to read something on the board while logged in.
- Fewer than 500 registered users have read posts while logged in in 2007, of those, 235 have posted.
General Board Usage:
1. I read B.org: (drop down maybe – to save space) a – several times a day – at least once a day c. – several times a week d. – at least once a week e. – less than once a week f. – less than once a month
2. I post on B.org: (drop down maybe) a – several times a day – at least once a day c. – several times a week d. – at least once a week e. – less than once a week f. – less than once a month
3. I post at b.org for: a. general social interaction/maintaining establishing friendships b. discussion of TV c. discussion of fandom d. more than one of the above e. none of the above f. all of the above
4. What threads do you consider essential to your experience? rank your top 3: (multi columns of all threads)
5. How do you navigate the board? a. Read New b. Click Threads c. Both d. I do not understand
Policy/Procedure
1. Would you be open to re-visiting the voting rules? Y/N
New Threads/Board Change
1. Do you like b.org the way it is and would prefer no major changes? Yes, The board works well enough, now/No, The board needs work.
2. Do you believe that splitting up the volume with multiple show threads dilutes or enhances the community? a. dilutes b. enhances c. unsure d. My answer is more complex than you allow me to answer
3. Would more television based threads increase your enjoyment of the board? Yes/No
4. Do we need to have some kind of check on thread creation to maintain the cultural center? Yes/No
5. If you voted yes to 4, what would it be? a. A limit on the number of threads b. A more difficult threshold to create threads (greater than a majority vote with quorom of 42) c. either of those d. neither of those e. Other (write in)
6. If there is one major thing you think is important that we did not address in this poll, please write it here. (text box)
msbelle, maybe a post in Press?
SHOULD I POST IT ANYWHERE ELSE?I think a link to it should maybe go in Natter, Bitches, Minearverse and the open show threads. I usually hate spamming the board, and love Press because it saves us that. I don't know. Definitely it should go in Press at the least.
I think that's a good poll, msbelle. Thanks to you, askye, Hec, and anyone else who helped craft it.
askye, Hec, and Sean need the thanks.
Well done, msbelle. The main comment I have is on the question in the Policy/Procedure section. The question as worded seems rather vague. For example, I'd be open to re-visiting the voting rules in the sense that I'd be willing to consider a proposal brought by someone else. But I don't see a need to revamp the rules wholesale.
Possibly --
1. Would you like to see a change in the voting rules? Y/N
2. If so, what issue(s) would you like to discuss? (text box)
On a lesser scale, you might want to consider rephrasing Question 5 under New Threads/Board Change to "If we do create a check on thread creation, what should it be?" To allow those who don't want a change to express a preference.