Buffy. When I saw you stop the world from, you know, ending, I just assumed that was a big week for you. Turns out I suddenly find myself needing to know the plural of 'apocalypse.'

Riley ,'Potential'


Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura

Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina


Jesse - Aug 01, 2007 10:14:22 am PDT #574 of 6786
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I agree that we should not bend over backwards to accomodate people who don't tell how us how we can accomodate them. That way lies madness. We've got plenty of madness without going and getting extra.

Heh. For reals.


le nubian - Aug 01, 2007 10:14:50 am PDT #575 of 6786
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

The technology issue is real, it seems to me. The bigger discussion about b.org culture of course overlays all this, but if we have real constraints on what we can do, then I think this should be taken into account.

I don't think those who are willing to donate more $$ should have a bigger say. Not what I was saying at all nor is that my intent.


Topic!Cindy - Aug 01, 2007 10:17:29 am PDT #576 of 6786
What is even happening?

Hec, I don't know. I honestly see this as yet another fruitless, tension filled conversation, now with added poll that can be a font of more fruitless, tension filled conversation for years to come.

But to me there doesn't seem to be any more inclination to talk television than Harry Potter or theremins or fanfiction.

If that were true, then there would not be a push to have multiple TV threads.

Yes, but there is a thread for Harry Potter -- and white font isn't required in it, and another for all books (~a general TV thread, only with books). There is a thread for music, in which the theramin talk would not have to be white fonted. In the fan fiction thread, you can discuss all fan fiction. We don't talk about those things in Natter.

I know people keep calling us a TV board. I think we aren't, really. We grew up around two specific shows, branched out almost effortlessly to follow the work of two specific guys.

We don't even really do that. I mean, Joss won't give us anything to follow. Tim, bless him, keeps trying, but he can't keep the fox out of his hen house.


Jesse - Aug 01, 2007 10:20:56 am PDT #577 of 6786
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

another for all books (~a general TV thread, only with books). There is a thread for music, in which the theramin talk would not have to be white fonted. In the fan fiction thread, you can discuss all fan fiction. We don't talk about those things in Natter.

Well, I talk about music in Natter, because I'm not into the kind of music that is generally talked about in there. And I know I've talked about books in Natter.

And on the flip side, none of those is a high-volume thread, because in most cases (Harry Potter aside), reading or listening to music or whatever isn't a mass media event that everyone participates in at the same time -- or even within a week of each other. It's just different.


bon bon - Aug 01, 2007 10:21:55 am PDT #578 of 6786
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

I don't think there's really a serious suggestion that posters who donate more should have some preference. I think the real point was that some lurkers contribute to the board in other ways. Moreover, this seems to be a touchy issue for something that's not really serious. I would suggest we not go much further down the path of everyone expressing opposition.


Atropa - Aug 01, 2007 10:28:20 am PDT #579 of 6786
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

People who post where ever are not lurkers.

This is it. If someone is posting somewhere on here, they aren't a lurker.

Those posters should speak up when we have these discussions and/or participate in voting, polls, whatever. If they don't, I think they've ceded what happens to the will of those of us who participate in this kind of thing.

Yep. There have been all sorts of votes or polls here that I haven't participated in because I didn't care strongly about them, and I was fine with whatever everyone else decided.


Hayden - Aug 01, 2007 10:34:25 am PDT #580 of 6786
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

I only expressed interest in fund-collecting in terms of information-gathering. I don't believe in the existence of this theoretical army of poll-skewing lurkers and I don't have any opinion on what constitutes the core of this group, if such a thing actually exists. My suggestions were only offered as ways of working towards having the best information to make the best choices available.

Edited because this statement was overly negative, and I regret it.


Jesse - Aug 01, 2007 10:37:47 am PDT #581 of 6786
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

You seriously don't think the people who expressed concerns about using financial contributions as a proxy for group participation were "scoffing" at the suggestion? If anything, Corwood, I think people took your suggestion overly seriously.


Miracleman - Aug 01, 2007 10:42:38 am PDT #582 of 6786
No, I don't think I will - me, quoting Captain Steve Rogers, to all of 2020

I don't believe in the existence of this theoretical army of poll-skewing lurkers

My Cyborg Army of the Undead Lurkers supports me in e-mail.

(Sorry. It just...popped in there.)


askye - Aug 01, 2007 10:42:47 am PDT #583 of 6786
Thrive to spite them

I wasn't scoffing at your idea. I was expressing my uneasiness with it.