I would vote for Uri Gellar, but only because our spoons are improperly bent.
'Time Bomb'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
We could pull in the Wolfram & Hart mindreaders.
Forget the mindreaders, get Files & Records.
I think the poll, should a poll happen, should include a question about general satisfaction with the board:
Do you like b.org the way it is? What would be the one thing you would add to it? remove from it? If you have dissatisfaction, can you pinpoint reasons why? things too fast/too slow/people no longer here/people I don't know/discussion in places I can't go/not the discussions I want/general malaise for "the way things were"/I like being upset so I'll never be happy with anything/other
I agree with this.
d, I don't think of you as a lurker (I also think that lurking is value neutral, FWIW) - I recognize you when you post. I really think of lurkers as people who only read along and never post. And I want to know about them (because I am, apparently, insanely curious about this issue), yet they are unknowable. It's a conundrum. For me.
I can't really contribute to the actual discussion yet, but a couple of pieces of data:
Lurkers vote. They also contribute. Not either in huge numbers, but I'm always seeing names I don't recognize. So unless there are people who only ever post in the (very few) threads I don't ever read, I'm going to call those people lurkers.
Also, remember this poll from a while back? [link] Just FYI.
I like how "ticky box" won.
I like how "ticky box" won.
Quite frankly, I didn't understand what that meant.
Okay, so we've not only had this conversation many times already, but we've already done the poll too? Seriously, laugh or cry? Somebody please tell me.
ETA: Although the poll was only two months ago. Still, we've already done one poll.
Okay, so we've not only had this conversation many times already, but we've already done the poll too?
And this surprises you why?
Still, we've already done one poll.
That poll doesn't tell me information that I need.
I don't know that it's relevant that we've discussed these issues before.
Previously people decided that it wasn't an issue. But with unchecked expansion now it is an issue. Context changes the discussion.
Seriously, laugh or cry? Somebody please tell me.
Dude, breath. Stepping into Bureaucracy is a marathon commitment, not a sprint. Only the stubborn and cranky survive.