Not removing the entries means less work for me, and as you know, Bob, I'm in favor of most activities that require me to do nothing.
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Pardon my ignorance, but what's all the hubbub about? I don't want to Natter in an unNattery thread, so just point me toward where drama apparently went down.
I'm with Hec. No changes necessary.
I'm seriously against any asterisks, stompy tags, or messing with the actual post record. The FAQ, otoh, is an excellent plan.
Thomas, the drama was on New Year's Eve, 2006 in Bureau, I think. But there have been some recent press mentions that have mostly been discussed in Natter over the last month, maybe.
I'm against revisionist history in principle - I'd say leave the quotes and the attribution as they stand.
I also oppose revising the facts -- what happened, happened, and I don't want to pretend it didn't. Adding an FAQ works for me.
I'd just as soon skip the FAQ myself.
Me too.
I can see hesitations about enshrining it in the FAQ, but it is a frequently enough asked question that having a short answer (with links) would have merit. "Go read through a deluge of emotional posts made at the time" is a bit of an investment.
Sure, one that fascinated the hell out of me, but I was there at the time.