I'm with Hec. No changes necessary.
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
I'm seriously against any asterisks, stompy tags, or messing with the actual post record. The FAQ, otoh, is an excellent plan.
Thomas, the drama was on New Year's Eve, 2006 in Bureau, I think. But there have been some recent press mentions that have mostly been discussed in Natter over the last month, maybe.
I'm against revisionist history in principle - I'd say leave the quotes and the attribution as they stand.
I also oppose revising the facts -- what happened, happened, and I don't want to pretend it didn't. Adding an FAQ works for me.
I'd just as soon skip the FAQ myself.
Me too.
I can see hesitations about enshrining it in the FAQ, but it is a frequently enough asked question that having a short answer (with links) would have merit. "Go read through a deluge of emotional posts made at the time" is a bit of an investment.
Sure, one that fascinated the hell out of me, but I was there at the time.
We should address it in the header on the frontpage.
While I support the idea of a FAQ, I suspect that there will be just as much controversy about the content of said entry. Any entry will have to be confined strictly to the facts.