The answer to that is that you don't control the group and the moderator prefers to only add people that s/he knows. And that you've already posted those pics to your general flickr site anyway (true or not)
Giles ,'Touched'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
I can see this creating a potentially sticky situation when a family member or co-worker asks why they can't see any of the pictures in that group.
Maybe it's just because my family doesn't work like that, but, really? Do they ask to read your diary, too?
I mean, practically speaking I'd probably just go all vague. "Oh, it's just some old friends. You don't know them." But I'd be seriously fucking annoyed if anything more than that were required.
This whole conversation makes me wonder exactly what you all were doing at the F2F. (I guess I should go join the group to see.)
This whole conversation makes me wonder exactly what you all were doing at the F2F. (I guess I should go join the group to see.)
heh. heh. heh.
Not that I've gotten around to dealing with my pictures yet, but I typically publish them through my .mac account. Flickr has never really appealed to me.
I guess the really troublemaking answer is to tell them to become Buffistas and then they can join the flickr group.
This whole conversation makes me wonder exactly what you all were doing at the F2F.
Pooping, according to amych's Freudian brain.
Hey, now, Everyone Poops!
It is so amych to link to the Librarything work page and not the Amazon page...
Natter 60: They Predicted This Back on Table Talk
(Cribbed from Steph L)