Oh, I'm never watching it again.
I didn't mean that. There was a long piece on Salon when it came out laying out the storyline which made it more coherent for me.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Oh, I'm never watching it again.
I didn't mean that. There was a long piece on Salon when it came out laying out the storyline which made it more coherent for me.
Twin Peaks pissed me off and I thought I hated David Lynch until I saw he directed The Straight Story. I guess I love everything with Richard Farnsworth in it.
I read the imdb synopses to work what had happened, but then was left with the why. The Salon piece would probably be better info.
Imdb had a list of Lynch's ten clues, and even they didn't help. On my phone so I can't link, but if someone could explain those to me, I'd be grateful.
Also watched the remake of The Manchurian Candidate (love both versions) and Serendipity which I enjoy in sparse doses.
Next up is to make a dent in my netflix queue by watching online. I'll die before that list gets shorter than 100.
::phone doublepost::
I really don't care for clever twists and stories I have to figure out by reading clues and explanations online somewhere. I don't want everything just handed to me, but Mulholland Dr wallows in a ridiculous level of obfuscation (or laziness?) in its storytelling. If I don't care whether a single character in your movie lives or dies, all the lovely cinematography and Hidden Layers Of Stuff won't save you.
I guess that means I'm not Lynch's advocate here...
I really don't care for clever twists and stories I have to figure out by reading clues and explanations online somewhere.
In fairness to Lynch, the twists aren't there just to give you a gotcha moment, but are completely justified by the narrative.
The story achieves a fair amount of emotional heft when you realize what's happening and it's not a place you can get to narratively if it was told in a straightforward fashion.
Salon's Mullholland Drive analysis
Can someone who liked Mulholland Drive sell it to me?
I liked it. I thought it was the closest movie equivalent I've seen to watching a dream. Other than that, I am at a loss to explain it further.
Thanks for the link, Hec. It doesn't help me like it, because I don't think that movies should be that much work (and the article seems to imply that it's even more work than I found it--is it really supposed to be hard to tell it's Naomi throughout?). It mentions Memento as being similarly arduous, but instead I found Memento rewarding once you click with it, which is eminently possible while you're still in the theatre.
Now to poke through the letters in response to the analysis.
I loved Mulholland Drive - even the first time i saw it and had no idea what I had just seen. Lynch stuff is always so creepy and intense. And this one had hot lesbians, too! I was meh on Memento.
It doesn't help me like it, because I don't think that movies should be that much work
I granted it some leeway because Lynch had to rescue what had originally been a TV pilot and some episodes and make a movie out of it. I think this is more successful than the similar re-edit of the Twin Peaks pilot into its european movie version.