River: You gave up everything you had. Simon: [Chinese] Everything I have is right here.

'Safe'


Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...

To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])


le nubian - Jun 27, 2012 12:22:53 am PDT #9901 of 11998
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

Vortex,

I saw it a few months back and I want you to explain the end to me because I have been puzzling over the end off and on for weeks and I can't for the life of me figure out if they ended it this way due to incompetence or if it was intentional or both.


§ ita § - Jun 29, 2012 5:58:55 pm PDT #9902 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm confused by something on Suits--the bit where the returning partner says he stole Jessica's tea set because his deceased wife had given it to her.

Is that supposed to be rational and defensible? In what world?

It sounds creepy and needy more than anything else.

Interesting corner they took with Louis. I kinda mostly buy it, since they haven't been showing him as incompetent, really--more of just an asshole and an asskisser. I mean, he'd have to be more than competent to work at such a demanding firm. It's just that Mike and Harvey and Jessica are crazy good.

Speaking of creepy--David Costabile is giving me shiver with the unctuous performance as Daniel. I can't tell--he could be malicious, or he could be sincere. Very confuse.

And, good lord--I think I google Meghan Markle every week. She is *gorgeous*. I can't get over the construction of her face. Such a great balance. And, hey! More light brown people with freckles. The world can't hae enough of those. Fuck, there's a lot of beautiful in this cast...


-t - Jun 29, 2012 6:15:35 pm PDT #9903 of 11998
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I assumed he was lying because that didn't make any sense. I mean, you want something to remind you of your wife, bring something from home, geez. But if he was just taking something of Jessica's to see if he could get away with it without anyone saying anything, he wouldn't want to say so.


§ ita § - Jun 29, 2012 7:10:22 pm PDT #9904 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

He either conveyed one of two things: a) I have extreme attachment issues and don't respect your boundaries or b) I'm a lying liar that lies as he drinks tea.

He doesn't seem stupid, so the weirdness of that admission took me by surprise. It's the closest thing to a chink he's displayed.


-t - Jun 29, 2012 7:48:50 pm PDT #9905 of 11998
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Yeah, I see no way for it to be other than very peculiar. I don't really know which stripe of peculiar it is, but I find the notion that he was sincere more off-putting, I think.


§ ita § - Jun 30, 2012 8:29:14 am PDT #9906 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So--Common Law.

Is the premise that these guys have performance issues that will be addressed with successful counselling, or are they doing penance for a particular eruption?

I don't think they're selling it that they work badly together and need help. And although every episode has a nod to the exercise of the week contributing to solving the mystery, but there's no indication anything is sticking.

And it's kinda conflicting with the "Odd couples make a good crimefighting team" that's pretty prevalent, not least of all on USA or TNT.

I mean, they clearly have a ridiculous number of closes, since they were bucking up on a record last week.

I know I'm not looking in the right place to find taut character studies and character growth, but it seems to hinge on the fact that the premise isn't true. White Collar and Leverage don't have to make any contradictory assertions when they mine conflict for humour, and they do get to resolve some of the tension, by showing the differences as a clear advantage, and they can move past it.

But the "it: is the entire premise of this show. The counsellor is kinda icky slick, but she or her equivalent has to be there for the entire series, and despite every breakthrough they have they can't make quantum leaps. In whatever.


§ ita § - Jul 14, 2012 10:23:22 am PDT #9907 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Okay, I'm just at the start of Cover Affairs, but I really hope Mojinder is not gone. Motherfucker. I liked his crafty shit. And I liked the multi culti thing they had going on with his white father and no fuss made of it.

Plus he's goddamned gorgeous.

However, why is Nina Myers on the show going by the name Nina Smith? Did they not have any other first names they could use? What about Natasha? That's a perfect cromulent name. Or Nadia!


sumi - Jul 14, 2012 10:51:28 am PDT #9908 of 11998
Art Crawl!!!

They just wanted to make sure we knew not to trust her?

Also, Jeff!!


Vortex - Jul 14, 2012 8:16:14 pm PDT #9909 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I dont know how I feel about Covert Affairs. One of the things that annoyed me was Annie's inability to follow orders if she didn't like them. Now that she's got this new touchy feely "tell me what you want to do" boss, I wonder if that will go away.


Jesse - Jul 15, 2012 4:25:47 am PDT #9910 of 11998
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Okay, I'm just at the start of Cover Affairs, but I really hope Mojinder is not gone. Motherfucker. I liked his crafty shit. And I liked the multi culti thing they had going on with his white father and no fuss made of it.

Seriously. I knew it was him as soon as I saw the ad that flashed faces, though -- of course all the white people get to live!

Speaking of culture, I wish White Collar had gone to a fake island, because that was not Cape Verde to a degree that was kind of offensive.